Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 100/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after July 8, 2016; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medications Ketorloc and Celebrex.

  • Decision # 99/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 3% has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 98/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 97/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 8, 2016.

  • Decision # 95/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 12, 2015; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of a walker.

  • Decision # 94/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 93/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 3, 2012.

  • Decision # 92/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 7, 2016.

  • Decision # 91/17

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the treatment of teeth #11 and #12.

  • Decision # 90/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 89/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 88/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 86/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 85/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 12, 2015.

  • Decision # 84/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 23, 2014.

  • Decision # 83/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 82/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 81/17

    Issue: Whether or not a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $559.12 per week should have been implemented effective March 16, 2013.

  • Decision # 80/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 79/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to a left index finger injury as being a consequence of the May 30, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 78/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 3, 2016; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after July 13, 2016.

  • Decision # 77/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a lump sum settlement of his Special Additional Compensation benefits; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further independent living assistance for house cleaning after August 31, 2015.

  • Decision # 76/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits in relation to the receipt of Canada Pension Plan Disability benefits.