Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 72/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 70/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 69/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left ear hearing loss is a consequence of the January 11, 2016 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 68/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to his accident of May 23, 2015.

  • Decision # 67/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer should be charged a portion of claims costs after October 3, 2014.

  • Decision # 66/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 65/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 64/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 9, 2015.

  • Decision # 63/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after July 15, 2016.

  • Decision # 62/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's entitlement to a clothing allowance and custom orthotics has been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 61/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 60/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to bilateral hearing aids.

  • Decision # 59/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 57/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 28, 2016.

  • Decision # 56/17

    Issue: Date of Accident October 31, 2015:Whether or not the worker's current back difficulties are a consequence of the October 31, 2015 accident.Date of Accident March 2, 2016:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 55/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's psychological difficulties are a consequence of the January 17, 2012 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 54/17

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of a tractor.

  • Decision # 53/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from December 22, 2014 to April 18, 2015.

  • Decision # 52/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective February 18, 2011.

  • Decision # 51/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 49/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 4.6% has been properly established; andWhether or not there is a limited duration of wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 48/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.