Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 12/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid $122,285.32 for 2019, 2020 and 2021; 2. Whether or not the overpayment must be repaid; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation services.

  • Decision # 11/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 21, 2021 in relation to their right shoulder complaints; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to their head and neck complaints.

  • Decision # 10/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's lung condition as being a consequence of the November 15, 2021 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 08/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/24

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left elbow difficulties as being a consequence of the May 21, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 05/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the time frame for appealing a penalty imposed under section 19.1(1) of the Act should be enlarged; and 2. Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed an administrative penalty for contravening section 19.1(1) of the Act; and 3. Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed an administrative penalty for contravening section 18(1) of the Act.

  • Decision # 04/24

    Issue: Date of Accident – March 5, 2019 (Left Hand):Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident – March 5, 2019 (Right Hand):Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after March 16, 2022.

  • Decision # 02/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of the overpayment.

  • Decision # 01/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 136/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 135/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's vocational rehabilitation plan should be extended.

  • Decision # 134/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 25, 2022; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after November 15, 2022.

  • Decision # 133/23

    Issue: Date of Accident - February 8, 2013:1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss after July 18, 2013; and 2. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.Date of Accident - May 30, 2014:1. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 132/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 31, 2023.

  • Decision # 131/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 19, 2021.

  • Decision # 130/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 25, 2023.

  • Decision # 129/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 128/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s estate is entitled to reimbursement for the Oxyneo medication at a dosage rate of 10 mg three times per day.

  • Decision # 127/23

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer (“Employer”) should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening section 19.1(2) of the WCA.

  • Decision # 126/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's initial weekly wage loss benefit rate has been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 125/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been calculated correctly; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 17, 2021.

  • Decision # 124/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.