Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 180/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 179/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 178/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed for costs associated with dental treatment.

  • Decision # 177/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 24, 2013

  • Decision # 176/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic and/or massage treatment in relation to the November 28, 1996 accident.

  • Decision # 175/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 174/18

    Issue: Whether or not the franchisee should be deemed to be a worker of the appellant firm.

  • Decision # 173/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 172/18

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is required to reimburse the WCB for retroactive premiums and penalties.

  • Decision # 171/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 170/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 18, 2017;Whether or not wage loss benefits paid from May 18, 2017 to August 5, 2017 represent an overpayment; andWhether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment to the WCB.

  • Decision # 169/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 168/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award

  • Decision # 167/18

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 166/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's back surgery as being a consequence of the July 1, 2010 accident.

  • Decision # 165/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 29, 2017.

  • Decision # 164/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 163/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 162/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the February 14, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 161/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current neck and back difficulties as being a consequence of the October 30, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 160/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 159/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left ankle surgery; andWhether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 158/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's back difficulties occurring February 2, 2016 are related to the September 26, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 157/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs of medical cannabis.

  • Decision # 156/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in the permanent partial impairment rating; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's psychological condition as being a consequence of the September 8, 1999 accident.