Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 88/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the November 12, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 87/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/25

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening s19.1(2) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 85/25

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 84/25

    Issue: 1. Is the worker entitled to full wage loss benefits from August 7, 2014 to September 5, 2014? 2. Is it appropriate to suspend the worker’s wage loss benefit entitlement after September 5, 2014? 3. Is it appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity equal to provincial minimum wage for a 40-hour week effective July 15, 2018?

  • Decision # 83/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 82/25

    Issue: Should the accident employer be assessed a $2,000.00 penalty for contravening s 19.1(2) of the Act?

  • Decision # 81/25

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 80/25

    Issue: 1. Whether the worker’s PPI rating of 41% for the physical injuries is correctly calculated. 2. Whether the worker’s PPI rating of 40% for the mental health injuries is correctly calculated. 3. Whether the worker’s PPI for the mental health injuries should be reduced by 50%.

  • Decision # 79/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/25

    Issue: Whether the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 5, 2024 in relation to the June 14, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 77/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a rateable permanent partial impairment.

  • Decision # 76/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 24, 2023; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after July 24, 2023.

  • Decision # 75/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 30, 2023.

  • Decision # 74/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated; 2. Whether or not the worker's deemed earning capacity has been correctly determined; 3. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits; and 4. Whether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 73/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to snow removal assistance.

  • Decision # 72/25

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to further benefits in relation to the back injury?

  • Decision # 71/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should be reduced by the post-accident deemed earning capacity effective March 21, 2019; 2. Whether or not the worker's restrictions are appropriate; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits from June 23, 2021 to December 20, 2021.

  • Decision # 70/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 24, 2024.

  • Decision # 69/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan associated with the National Occupation Classification (NOC) 4412 – Home support workers, housekeepers and related occupations is appropriate; and 2. Whether or not the implementation of the deemed earning capacity effective January 9, 2023 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 68/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 8, 2024; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment after May 8, 2024.

  • Decision # 67/25

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the May 12, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 66/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 5% and the associated monetary award of $7,300.00 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 65/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after February 3, 2013; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for a diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome as being a consequence of the March 13, 2007 accident.

  • Decision # 64/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should have been suspended effective January 9, 2003; 2. Whether or not the worker's post-accident deemed earning capacity remains appropriate as of August 1, 2005; 3. Whether or not it is appropriate to apportion 50% of the worker's Canada Pension Plan Disability Benefit to the accident effective August 1, 2005; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits after July 31, 2005.