Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 126/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 125/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's payment for hours lost to attend medical appointments has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 124/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for February 10 and 11, 2021.

  • Decision # 123/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further coverage for the medication Nifedipine (Adalat).

  • Decision # 122/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the July 2, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 121/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker was overpaid $2,137.14 in 2017; and2. Whether or not the worker is responsible for the repayment of the overpayment.

  • Decision # 120/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 8, 2019.

  • Decision # 119/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 118/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 117/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 13, 2019; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after September 27, 2019.

  • Decision # 116/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment award of 2% has been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 115/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 114/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to 100% cost transfer.

  • Decision # 113/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 17, 2020.

  • Decision # 112/21

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 111/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 110/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 25, 2020.

  • Decision # 109/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the June 17, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 108/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits and services including temporary total disability, medical aid, permanent partial disability and vocational rehabilitation.

  • Decision # 107/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the periods of March 24, 2020 to March 27, 2020 and April 5, 2020 to April 27, 2020.

  • Decision # 106/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 105/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right 4th and 5th finger difficulties as being related to the October 9, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 104/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 25, 2019.

  • Decision # 103/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the December 6, 2019 surgery.

  • Decision # 102/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.