Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 158/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 157/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 156/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 155/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 154/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 28, 2017.

  • Decision # 153/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 152/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for a psychological condition in relation to the March 29, 1984 and/or the March 15, 1993 accidents.

  • Decision # 151/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 150/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 149/19

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for acupuncture and a La-Z-Boy chair; 2. Whether or not there is entitlement to spousal wage replacement benefits; 3. Whether or not further responsibility should be accepted for the costs of opioid medication; 4. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs of cannabis.

  • Decision # 148/19

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 1411, General Office Clerk, is appropriate.

  • Decision # 147/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 146/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after January 4, 2019.

  • Decision # 145/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to his psychological condition.

  • Decision # 144/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 143/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 142/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 141/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 140/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 24, 2018.

  • Decision # 139/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the January 19, 2009 accident;Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the August 13, 2009 accident.

  • Decision # 138/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's bilateral shoulder surgeries as being a consequence of the August 3, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 137/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits in relation to the July 7, 2009 accident.

  • Decision # 136/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's death is a result of a compensable condition or treatment.

  • Decision # 135/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after November 2, 2017.

  • Decision # 134/19

    Issue: Whether the worker's current low back and left shoulder difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the October 18, 2017 accident.