Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 21/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 30, 2025.

  • Decision # 20/26

    Issue: Should responsibility be accepted for the proposed right knee surgery?

  • Decision # 19/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the December 6, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 18/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to coverage for an electric stair lift and massage chair?

  • Decision # 17/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/26

    Issue: 1. Was the worker overpaid $4,990.10? 2. Is the worker required to pay back the overpayment?

  • Decision # 15/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 14/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the March 21, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 13/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits in relation to the August 2, 2024 accident?

  • Decision # 12/26

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s left ring finger difficulties as being a consequence of the May 28, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 11/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to replacement hearing aids?

  • Decision # 10/26

    Issue: 1. Is the vocational rehabilitation plan under NOC 6623, Other Sales Related Occupations, appropriate? 2. Should the worker’s wage loss benefits be reduced by the post-accident deemed earning capacity effective August 20, 2021?

  • Decision # 09/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 08/26

    Issue: Are the average earnings correct?

  • Decision # 07/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the March 19, 2021 accident?

  • Decision # 06/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits after April 3, 2025?

  • Decision # 05/26

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is required to pay the outstanding balance on their account.

  • Decision # 04/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 31, 2025 in relation to the April 10, 2022 accident.

  • Decision # 03/26

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 5, 2018; and 2. Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating of 1% and the monetary award of $1,250.00 have been correctly established.

  • Decision # 02/26

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s neck difficulties as being a consequence of the April 15, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 01/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 114/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s L5/S1 disc protrusion and lumbar radicular symptoms should be accepted as being a consequence of the December 3, 2024 accident.

  • Decision # 112/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's estate is entitled to compensation for dependents.

  • Decision # 111/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period March 14, 2025 to May 12, 2025; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits effective May 13, 2025.