Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 48/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 47/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder difficulties as being related to the November 26, 2019 accident; and2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 46/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 45/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s current psychological difficulties should be accepted as a recurrence; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing March 24, 2020.

  • Decision # 43/21

    Issue: Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a $4,000.00 penalty against the employer for violation of sections 19.1(1) and 19.1(2) of the Act.

  • Decision # 42/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 1, 2018.

  • Decision # 41/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the December 30, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 40/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 39/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s recurrent neck difficulties as being related to the October 5, 2010 accident.

  • Decision # 38/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility for the worker's current bilateral shoulder difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the October 6, 1993 accident.

  • Decision # 37/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 15, 2018.

  • Decision # 34/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period March 11, 2020 to March 20, 2020.

  • Decision # 33/21

    Issue: Employer Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective November 19, 2018;Worker Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 29, 2019.

  • Decision # 32/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 18, 2016.

  • Decision # 31/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current back issues in relation to the February 23, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 30/21

    Issue: Whether or not the diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome should be accepted as being a consequence of the July 17, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 29/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current left elbow difficulties.

  • Decision # 28/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for October 24, 2019 and October 25, 2019; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period October 30, 2019 to December 4, 2019.

  • Decision # 27/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 24/21

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.