Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 36/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 35/26

    Issue: Is there entitlement for hearing aids?

  • Decision # 34/26

    Issue: 1. Did the firm commit claim suppression under section 19.1(1) of The Workers Compensation Act; and 2. Is the firm required to pay a $4,000.00 administrative penalty.

  • Decision # 33/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 32/26

    Issue: Accident of May 1, 2025: 1. Are the worker's current back symptoms related to the May 1, 2025 accident? 2. Is the worker entitled to benefits beyond May 23, 2025?Accident of May 14, 2025: 1. Are the worker's current back symptoms related to the May 14, 2025 accident? 2. Is the worker entitled to benefits beyond January 9, 2026?

  • Decision # 31/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 20, 2022.

  • Decision # 30/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to further benefits?

  • Decision # 29/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to a hearing aid for their left ear?

  • Decision # 28/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 28, 2018.

  • Decision # 27/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for a left knee injury.

  • Decision # 26/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits beyond June 27, 2025?

  • Decision # 25/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 22, 2023.

  • Decision # 24/26

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan under NOC 1411, General Office Support Worker, is appropriate; and 2. Whether or not the worker’s wage loss benefits should be reduced by the post-accident deemed earning capacity effective February 28, 2023.

  • Decision # 23/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 22/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 30, 2025.

  • Decision # 20/26

    Issue: Should responsibility be accepted for the proposed right knee surgery?

  • Decision # 19/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the December 6, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 18/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to coverage for an electric stair lift and massage chair?

  • Decision # 17/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/26

    Issue: 1. Was the worker overpaid $4,990.10? 2. Is the worker required to pay back the overpayment?

  • Decision # 15/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 14/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the March 21, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 13/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits in relation to the August 2, 2024 accident?

  • Decision # 12/26

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s left ring finger difficulties as being a consequence of the May 28, 2020 accident.