Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 57/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 56/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the January 24, 2025 accident.

  • Decision # 55/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 54/26

    Issue: Was the method used to calculate average earnings correct?

  • Decision # 53/26

    Issue: Is a diagnosis of Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) accepted and related to the September 18, 2021 injury?

  • Decision # 52/26

    Issue: Is the permanent partial impairment rating of 17% and award of $27,200.00 for the left eye injury correct?

  • Decision # 51/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 49/26

    Issue: Is the employer entitled to cost relief due to a pre-existing condition?

  • Decision # 48/26

    Issue: Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective May 14, 2022.

  • Decision # 47/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 46/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 45/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the September 22, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 44/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 43/26

    Issue: Is there entitlement to benefits after November 2, 2022?

  • Decision # 42/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits after December 15, 2025?

  • Decision # 41/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits after September 13, 2024?

  • Decision # 40/26

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits beyond June 10, 2025 due to the November 13, 2024 accident?

  • Decision # 39/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 38/26

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the medications Venlafaxine, Gabapentin and Ropinirole.

  • Decision # 37/26

    Issue: 1. Are the worker’s permanent restrictions appropriate? 2. Is the vocational rehabilitation plan for NOC 64409 – Other Customer and Information Services Representatives appropriate? and 3. Should a deemed earning capacity for NOC 64409 be implemented effective September 22, 2023?

  • Decision # 36/26

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 35/26

    Issue: Is there entitlement for hearing aids?

  • Decision # 34/26

    Issue: 1. Did the firm commit claim suppression under section 19.1(1) of The Workers Compensation Act; and 2. Is the firm required to pay a $4,000.00 administrative penalty.

  • Decision # 33/26

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.