Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 114/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s L5/S1 disc protrusion and lumbar radicular symptoms should be accepted as being a consequence of the December 3, 2024 accident.

  • Decision # 112/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's estate is entitled to compensation for dependents.

  • Decision # 111/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period March 14, 2025 to May 12, 2025; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits effective May 13, 2025.

  • Decision # 110/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 109/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 4031 – Teacher is appropriate; 2. Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6552 – Customer Service is appropriate; and 3. Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a deemed earning capacity for National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6552 – Customer Service effective April 6, 2024.

  • Decision # 108/25

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is responsible to pay $2,021.39 in unpaid premiums and penalties.

  • Decision # 107/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 11, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 106/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid wage loss benefits; and 2. Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of the overpayment.

  • Decision # 105/25

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits were correctly suspended from July 5, 2025 to July 28, 2025; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for a laptop table.

  • Decision # 104/25

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to wage loss benefits from April 22, 2025 to April 30, 2025?

  • Decision # 103/25

    Issue: 1. Should the WCB accept responsibility for the worker’s left shoulder difficulties as a consequence of the January 4, 2025 accident? 2. Is the worker entitled to wage loss benefits for February 1, 2025 to February 7, 2025?

  • Decision # 102/25

    Issue: Worker Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period July 8, 2023 to January 1, 2024.Employer Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits for the period July 8, 2023 to January 1, 2024.

  • Decision # 101/25

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief due to a pre-existing condition.

  • Decision # 100/25

    Issue: Whether or not the established allowance for the worker's Independent Living Assistance and Personal Care Assistance have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 99/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 15, 2023.

  • Decision # 98/25

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits for a diagnosis of PTSD?

  • Decision # 97/25

    Issue: Does the worker's permanent partial disability rating of 12% remain appropriate?

  • Decision # 96/25

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is entitled to relief from paying the $500.00 administrative penalty for contravening s 18(3) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 95/25

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 94/25

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits after March 13, 2025.

  • Decision # 93/25

    Issue: 1. Is the claim acceptable? 2. Is the worker entitled to wage loss benefits from April 24, 2025 to May 9, 2025?

  • Decision # 92/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/25

    Issue: Whether the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6411 – Sales and Account Representatives – wholesale trade (non-technical), effective August 6, 2022 was appropriate.

  • Decision # 90/25

    Issue: 1. Has the worker been overpaid benefits? 2. Is the overpayment amount correctly calculated? 3. Is the worker responsible for repayment of the overpayment?