Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 107/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the periods of March 24, 2020 to March 27, 2020 and April 5, 2020 to April 27, 2020.

  • Decision # 106/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 105/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right 4th and 5th finger difficulties as being related to the October 9, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 104/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 25, 2019.

  • Decision # 103/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the December 6, 2019 surgery.

  • Decision # 102/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 101/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 100/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 28, 2018.

  • Decision # 99/21

    Issue: Whether or not the right of action is removed pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

  • Decision # 98/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee difficulties as being related to the February 4, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 97/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for prescription opioid medication after August 31, 2020.

  • Decision # 95/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 94/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the purchase of a computer/laptop.

  • Decision # 93/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right elbow difficulties after March 8, 2019 in relation to the November 27, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 92/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the proposed dental treatment.

  • Decision # 90/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 14, 2018.

  • Decision # 89/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 22, 2020.

  • Decision # 88/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 7, 2018 in relation to the January 26, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 78/21

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident – November 1, 1995: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current bilateral arm difficulties as being related to the November 1, 1995 accident; and 2. Date of Accident – April 8, 2019: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 77/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment after October 30, 2018.

  • Decision # 76/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility can be accepted for the worker's right hand and finger complaints as being related to the May 25, 1990 compensable injury.