Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 103/25

    Issue: 1. Should the WCB accept responsibility for the worker’s left shoulder difficulties as a consequence of the January 4, 2025 accident? 2. Is the worker entitled to wage loss benefits for February 1, 2025 to February 7, 2025?

  • Decision # 102/25

    Issue: Worker Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period July 8, 2023 to January 1, 2024.Employer Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits for the period July 8, 2023 to January 1, 2024.

  • Decision # 101/25

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief due to a pre-existing condition.

  • Decision # 100/25

    Issue: Whether or not the established allowance for the worker's Independent Living Assistance and Personal Care Assistance have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 99/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 15, 2023.

  • Decision # 98/25

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits for a diagnosis of PTSD?

  • Decision # 97/25

    Issue: Does the worker's permanent partial disability rating of 12% remain appropriate?

  • Decision # 96/25

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is entitled to relief from paying the $500.00 administrative penalty for contravening s 18(3) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 95/25

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 94/25

    Issue: Is the worker entitled to benefits after March 13, 2025.

  • Decision # 93/25

    Issue: 1. Is the claim acceptable? 2. Is the worker entitled to wage loss benefits from April 24, 2025 to May 9, 2025?

  • Decision # 92/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/25

    Issue: Whether the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6411 – Sales and Account Representatives – wholesale trade (non-technical), effective August 6, 2022 was appropriate.

  • Decision # 90/25

    Issue: 1. Has the worker been overpaid benefits? 2. Is the overpayment amount correctly calculated? 3. Is the worker responsible for repayment of the overpayment?

  • Decision # 89/25

    Issue: 1. Should the claim accepted for an accident occurring February 3, 2014 include incidents of harassment/bullying other than those identified by the WCB in their February 8, 2022 decision?  2. Is the worker entitled to benefits in relation to the February 3, 2014 accident?

  • Decision # 88/25

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the November 12, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 87/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/25

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening s19.1(2) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 85/25

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 84/25

    Issue: 1. Is the worker entitled to full wage loss benefits from August 7, 2014 to September 5, 2014? 2. Is it appropriate to suspend the worker’s wage loss benefit entitlement after September 5, 2014? 3. Is it appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity equal to provincial minimum wage for a 40-hour week effective July 15, 2018?

  • Decision # 83/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 82/25

    Issue: Should the accident employer be assessed a $2,000.00 penalty for contravening s 19.1(2) of the Act?

  • Decision # 81/25

    Issue: Is the claim acceptable?

  • Decision # 80/25

    Issue: 1. Whether the worker’s PPI rating of 41% for the physical injuries is correctly calculated. 2. Whether the worker’s PPI rating of 40% for the mental health injuries is correctly calculated. 3. Whether the worker’s PPI for the mental health injuries should be reduced by 50%.

  • Decision # 79/25

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.