Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 108/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 107/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 105/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 104/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further massage therapy treatment.

  • Decision # 103/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 15, 2018 in relation to his low back difficulties.

  • Decision # 102/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 101/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right shoulder difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the March 10, 2017 accident; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 13, 2017 to March 20, 2017; and, Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 29, 2017 to April 11, 2017.

  • Decision # 100/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 99/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's wrist injury as being a consequence of the June 15, 2018 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 15, 2018.

  • Decision # 97/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period March 20, 2017 to June 25, 2017.

  • Decision # 96/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for opioid medications after January 10, 2019;Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for Cyclobenzaprine.

  • Decision # 95/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 13, 2014.

  • Decision # 94/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the June 15, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 93/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 17, 1997.

  • Decision # 92/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the April 21, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 91/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 5, 2017.

  • Decision # 89/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current right shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the November 7, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 88/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further medical aid benefits in relation to the September 19, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 87/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right wrist difficulties as being a consequence of the January 22, 2013 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after October 30, 2016.

  • Decision # 86/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 85/19

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's psychological diagnosis should be accepted as being a consequence of the February 10, 2011 accident; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further psychotherapy treatment; 3. Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits were correctly suspended after March 27, 2015; 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further opioid medication after September 2, 2015; 5. Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for any medication other than Lyrica as of September 14, 2015; 6. Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement of taxi cab expenses after November 28, 2014.

  • Decision # 84/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.