Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 26/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 8, 2018.

  • Decision # 25/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after June 5, 2017.

  • Decision # 24/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 23/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current radial collateral ligament difficulties as being a consequence of the December 5, 2012 accident.

  • Decision # 22/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for left knee medial meniscus tear as being a consequence of the March 13, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 21/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 20/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the June 7, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 19/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid after May 3, 2018.

  • Decision # 18/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 17/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 16/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 15/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits.

  • Decision # 14/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right hand/arm injury as being related to the August 24, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 13/19

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant firm should be considered the deemed employer.

  • Decision # 12/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the July 5, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 10/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the May 7, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 09/19

    Issue: September 11, 2014 Accident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable;April 25, 2016 Accident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable;February 2, 2018 Accident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 08/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after April 5, 2017.

  • Decision # 07/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right knee difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the June 15, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 06/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 1, 2017.

  • Decision # 05/19

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 04/19

    Issue: February 8, 2017 Accident - whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits inrelation to the February 8, 2017 accident;November 16, 2017 Accident - whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 8, 2018 in relation to the November 16, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 03/19

    Issue: Whether or not the director's liability in the amount of $25,679.78 associated with the outstanding balance of the firm's account has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 02/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.