Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 17/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 15/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating of 2.89% has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 13/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/21

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident – May 29, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the May 29, 2017 accident; and2. Date of Accident – June 14, 2017: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right elbow difficulties as being a consequence of the June 14, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 11/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 10/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the February 16, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 08/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the right hip; and 2. Whether or not responsibility for the proposed right hip surgery should be accepted.

  • Decision # 07/21

    Issue: Accident of September 16, 2003: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s psychological condition as being a consequence of the September 16, 2003 accident; andAccident of September 1, 2017: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed right shoulder surgery as being a consequence of the August 15, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 05/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 19, 2018.

  • Decision # 04/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 8, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 04/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 03/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/21

    Issue: Whether or not in addition to counselling, there is entitlement to child benefits.

  • Decision # 02/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 25, 2019; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 02/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed dental treatment.

  • Decision # 01/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/21

    Issue: Whether or not the time for filing an appeal should be extended; andWhether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 136/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 22, 2017.

  • Decision # 135/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 134/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 30, 2019.

  • Decision # 133/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 31, 2019.