Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 72/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 20, 2018.

  • Decision # 71/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 70/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 69/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits after October 23, 2019.

  • Decision # 68/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 67/20

    Issue: Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a graduated return to work program effective October 4, 2017; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits throughout the graduated return to work program.

  • Decision # 66/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 65/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating of 4% is correct; andWhether or not the worker’s monetary value of the permanent partial impairment award has been calculated correctly.

  • Decision # 64/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 63/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 62/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 61/20

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medication Nabilone.

  • Decision # 60/20

    Issue: 1. Accident of June 4, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 25, 2019; 2. Accident of May 8, 2019: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 20, 2019.

  • Decision # 59/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 57/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid partial wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 56/20

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award for her neck; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award for Major Depressive Disorder; 3. Whether or not the worker is considered to be competitively unemployable or totally disabled; 4. Whether or not responsibility for the medications Mobicox, Tylenol #3, Celebrex and/or Diclofenac should be accepted.

  • Decision # 55/20

    Issue: 1. Accident of March 1, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 2. Accident of June 11, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 3. Accident of August 1, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 4. Accident of August 20, 2013: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; 5. Accident of July 9, 2013: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after July 26, 2013; 6. Accident of September 11, 2013: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 17, 2014.

  • Decision # 54/20

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after December 16, 2017; 2. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits for the period December 17, 2017 to November 30, 2018; 3. Whether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after November 30, 2018.

  • Decision # 53/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 52/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 31, 2017; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after December 28, 2017.

  • Decision # 51/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 49/20

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant firm should be considered the deemed employer.

  • Decision # 48/20

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident - April 251996: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated;2. Date of Accident - November 28, 2017: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.