Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 115/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from December 8, 2017 to December 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 114/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 9, 2018; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 112/19

    Issue: Date of Accident: August 20, 2017Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident: October 11, 2017Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 111/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an allowance for footwear in addition to work boots.

  • Decision # 110/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 109/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 108/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 107/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 105/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 104/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further massage therapy treatment.

  • Decision # 103/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 15, 2018 in relation to his low back difficulties.

  • Decision # 102/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 101/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right shoulder difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the March 10, 2017 accident; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 13, 2017 to March 20, 2017; and, Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 29, 2017 to April 11, 2017.

  • Decision # 100/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 99/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's wrist injury as being a consequence of the June 15, 2018 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 15, 2018.

  • Decision # 97/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period March 20, 2017 to June 25, 2017.

  • Decision # 96/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for opioid medications after January 10, 2019;Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for Cyclobenzaprine.

  • Decision # 95/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 13, 2014.

  • Decision # 94/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the June 15, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 93/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 17, 1997.

  • Decision # 92/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the April 21, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 91/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.