Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 03/24
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after March 16, 2022.
-
Decision # 03/24
Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.
-
Decision # 02/24
Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of the overpayment.
-
Decision # 02/24
Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.
-
Decision # 01/24
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 01/24
Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.
-
Decision # 136/23
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 135/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker's vocational rehabilitation plan should be extended.
-
Decision # 134/23
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 25, 2022; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after November 15, 2022.
-
Decision # 133/23
Issue: Date of Accident - February 8, 2013:1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss after July 18, 2013; and 2. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.Date of Accident - May 30, 2014:1. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 132/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 31, 2023.
-
Decision # 131/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 19, 2021.
-
Decision # 130/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 25, 2023.
-
Decision # 129/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.
-
Decision # 128/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s estate is entitled to reimbursement for the Oxyneo medication at a dosage rate of 10 mg three times per day.
-
Decision # 127/23
Issue: Whether or not the accident employer (“Employer”) should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening section 19.1(2) of the WCA.
-
Decision # 126/23
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's initial weekly wage loss benefit rate has been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 125/23
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been calculated correctly; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 17, 2021.
-
Decision # 124/23
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 123/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 6.88% and the monetary award of $7,380.00 as established in May 2014 have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 122/23
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 25, 2012; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after September 17, 2012.
-
Decision # 121/23
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated; 2. Whether or not the worker’s restrictions have been correctly established; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits and services; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 6, 2018.
-
Decision # 120/23
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 119/23
Issue: Whether or not the worker's left medial meniscal tear should be accepted as being a consequence of the March 2, 2022 accident.
-
Decision # 118/23
Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to 50% cost relief for a pre-existing condition.