Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 08/20

    Issue: Whether or not in addition to discretionary counselling services, the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/20

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/20

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant’s dental treatment as being a consequence of the October 29, 2018 incident.

  • Decision # 05/20

    Issue: Date of Accident - February 23, 2017:Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits for his right shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the February 23, 2017 accident;Date of Accident - February 16, 2018:Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 16, 2018.

  • Decision # 05/20

    Issue: Whether or not the time for filing an appeal should be extended; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed dental treatment.

  • Decision # 04/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 04/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to full dental coverage.

  • Decision # 03/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/20

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 8, 2017 to February 7, 2018; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 7, 2018.

  • Decision # 02/20

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after December 11, 2015; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further vocational rehabilitation assistance.

  • Decision # 01/20

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 158/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 157/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 156/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 155/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 154/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 28, 2017.

  • Decision # 153/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 152/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for a psychological condition in relation to the March 29, 1984 and/or the March 15, 1993 accidents.

  • Decision # 151/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 150/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 149/19

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for acupuncture and a La-Z-Boy chair; 2. Whether or not there is entitlement to spousal wage replacement benefits; 3. Whether or not further responsibility should be accepted for the costs of opioid medication; 4. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs of cannabis.