Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 128/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker failed in his duty to report his return to work; andWhether or not the $225.00 penalty assessed against the worker should be reduced or waived.

  • Decision # 127/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 126/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 7, 2019.

  • Decision # 125/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for her recurrent mental health difficulties.

  • Decision # 124/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective July 10, 2019.

  • Decision # 123/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 122/20

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed back surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 20, 2018.

  • Decision # 121/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 120/20

    Issue: Whether or not the occupational goal within National Occupation Classification (NOC) 7411 Truck Driver is appropriate; andWhether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity in the amount of $421.00 per week effective August 26, 2000.

  • Decision # 119/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the September 18, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 118/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 22, 2017.

  • Decision # 117/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 20, 2019.

  • Decision # 116/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 115/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 114/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to his current right shoulder difficulties.

  • Decision # 113/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period August 15, 2019 to August 22, 2019.

  • Decision # 112/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 23, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 111/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from June 11, 2019 to June 17, 2019.

  • Decision # 110/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 109/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 108/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits in relation to the June 29, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 107/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 22, 2019 in relation to the March 8, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 105/20

    Issue: Accident of June 1, 2001: Whether or not the worker’s claim is acceptable; andAccident of November 1, 2010: Whether or not the worker’s claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 104/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.