Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 112/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 111/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 110/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 27, 2017.

  • Decision # 109/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 108/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 3, 2016.

  • Decision # 107/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits for the period of March 14, 2017 to May 31, 2017.

  • Decision # 106/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 105/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs associated with flanges in relation to the December 11, 2016 surgery.

  • Decision # 104/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 103/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 102/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's bilateral hand/arm/elbow and shoulder difficulties are compensable;Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 13, 2015.

  • Decision # 101/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings effective October 4, 2017 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 100/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 99/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable;Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 1, 2017.

  • Decision # 98/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits are considered to be wages under The Garnishment Act;Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 97/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 96/18

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 0911 - Manufacturing Managers is appropriate;Whether or not the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $918.00 per week effective February 24, 2018 is appropriate;Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's psychological difficulties as being a consequence of the February 20, 2014 accident; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medications Metformin, Ramipril, Atorvastatin, Apo-Gliclazide and Adalat in relation to the February 20, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 95/18

    Issue: Whether or not the right of action filed by an injured student against her educational institute and/or placement facility is barred pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

  • Decision # 94/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 93/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 92/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/18

    Issue: Whether or not the duration of the worker's benefits is appropriate.

  • Decision # 89/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for coverage of medical marijuana.

  • Decision # 88/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 27, 2017.