Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 89/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 9, 2022 to July 3, 2022.

  • Decision # 88/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/23

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening s19.1(1) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 86/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 21, 2022 in relation to the December 8, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 85/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 16, 2021.

  • Decision # 84/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for a peripheral nerve stimulator implantation.

  • Decision # 83/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 16, 2022.

  • Decision # 82/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after October 13, 2021.

  • Decision # 81/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for August 29, 2022; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits from August 31, 2022 to November 3, 2022; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 3, 2022.

  • Decision # 80/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after November 20, 2019 in relation to the January 4, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 79/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the medication Concerta.

  • Decision # 78/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 1, 2020.

  • Decision # 77/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome should be accepted as being a consequence of the May 15, 2019 accident; 2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for intravenous Ketamine/Lidocaine treatment; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after March 17, 2022.

  • Decision # 76/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 75/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period November 3, 2022 to November 25, 2022.

  • Decision # 74/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not wage loss benefits are limited to two hours of time loss on July 20, 2022; 2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right leg/hip and sacrum difficulties as being related to the July 8, 2022 accident; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period August 4, 2022 to August 10, 2022.

  • Decision # 72/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 71/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 70/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6421, Retail Sales is appropriate; and 2. Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $440.00 per week effective August 18, 2017.

  • Decision # 69/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for the right ear.

  • Decision # 68/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for additional travel expenses related to their travel between their residence and place of employment.

  • Decision # 67/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 66/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to their ongoing eye issues.

  • Decision # 65/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.