Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 52/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the January 6, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 51/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's permanent partial rating of 1% has been correctly established; and 2. Whether or not the monetary award for the impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 50/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not it is appropriate to implement the graduated return to work program effective June 29, 2022; and 2. Whether or not the worker is capable of working on a full time basis with restrictions effective August 19, 2022.

  • Decision # 49/24

    Issue: Whether or not the estate is entitled to reimbursement for the purchase of a scooter.

  • Decision # 48/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for the left ear.

  • Decision # 47/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 46/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/24

    Issue: Whether or not the additional PPI rating of 4.08% and the monetary award of $6,250.00 was correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 44/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional chiropractic treatment; and 2. Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective August 6, 2006.

  • Decision # 42/24

    Issue: Whether or not the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective April 25, 2022 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 41/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 40/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after November 8, 2023.

  • Decision # 39/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 14, 2022.

  • Decision # 38/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability or wage loss benefits following their retirement in 1999.

  • Decision # 37/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/24

    Issue: Whether or not the employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening section 19.1(1) of the Act.

  • Decision # 35/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 15, 2022 accident.

  • Decision # 34/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits after June 23, 2023.

  • Decision # 32/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 31/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for crowns on teeth 14 and 15.

  • Decision # 30/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after February 15, 2022.

  • Decision # 28/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.