Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 52/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 51/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 29, 2018.

  • Decision # 50/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the accident of November 1, 2017.

  • Decision # 49/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 48/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 47/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 29, 2016.

  • Decision # 46/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 3, 2012.

  • Decision # 44/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after May 29, 2017.

  • Decision # 42/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for mileage expenses from his current residence.

  • Decision # 41/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period April 11, 2018 to April 20, 2018; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 20, 2018.

  • Decision # 40/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for massage therapy treatment.

  • Decision # 39/19

    Issue: Whether or not the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $418.00 per week effective August 12, 2013 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 38/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 37/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the July 15, 2015 accident.

  • Decision # 36/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 34/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's eye difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the February 1, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 33/19

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment after June 1, 2018.

  • Decision # 32/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for March 28 and 29, 2018.

  • Decision # 31/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 30/19

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's physical restrictions are appropriate.

  • Decision # 28/19

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period May 28, 2018 to May 30, 2018.