Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 02/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 25, 2019; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 02/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed dental treatment.

  • Decision # 01/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/21

    Issue: Whether or not the time for filing an appeal should be extended; andWhether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 136/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 22, 2017.

  • Decision # 135/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 134/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 30, 2019.

  • Decision # 133/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 31, 2019.

  • Decision # 132/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 1.71% has been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 131/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 7, 2019; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after August 7, 2019.

  • Decision # 130/20

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder surgery as being a consequence of the June 17, 2019 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after December 9, 2019.

  • Decision # 129/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s mileage expenses have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 128/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker failed in his duty to report his return to work; andWhether or not the $225.00 penalty assessed against the worker should be reduced or waived.

  • Decision # 127/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 126/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 7, 2019.

  • Decision # 125/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for her recurrent mental health difficulties.

  • Decision # 124/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective July 10, 2019.

  • Decision # 123/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 122/20

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed back surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 20, 2018.

  • Decision # 121/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 120/20

    Issue: Whether or not the occupational goal within National Occupation Classification (NOC) 7411 Truck Driver is appropriate; andWhether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity in the amount of $421.00 per week effective August 26, 2000.

  • Decision # 119/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the September 18, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 118/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 22, 2017.

  • Decision # 117/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 20, 2019.

  • Decision # 116/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.