Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 132/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 131/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current low back difficulties as being related to the February 20, 2013 accident.

  • Decision # 130/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 129/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 128/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 127/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 126/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 125/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's payment for hours lost to attend medical appointments has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 124/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for February 10 and 11, 2021.

  • Decision # 123/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further coverage for the medication Nifedipine (Adalat).

  • Decision # 122/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the July 2, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 121/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker was overpaid $2,137.14 in 2017; and2. Whether or not the worker is responsible for the repayment of the overpayment.

  • Decision # 120/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 8, 2019.

  • Decision # 119/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 118/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 117/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 13, 2019; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after September 27, 2019.

  • Decision # 116/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment award of 2% has been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 115/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 114/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to 100% cost transfer.

  • Decision # 113/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 17, 2020.

  • Decision # 112/21

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 111/21

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 110/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 25, 2020.

  • Decision # 109/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the June 17, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 108/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits and services including temporary total disability, medical aid, permanent partial disability and vocational rehabilitation.