Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 164/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses.

  • Decision # 163/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 19, 2016.

  • Decision # 162/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 161/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 160/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 29, 2015.

  • Decision # 159/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 158/17

    Issue: Whether or not repayment of the overpayment would result in financial hardship.

  • Decision # 157/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after March 11, 2016.

  • Decision # 156/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 1, 2016.

  • Decision # 155/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 154/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 9, 2016.

  • Decision # 153/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 152/17

    Issue: Whether or not the diagnosis of a hernia is causally related to the May 9, 2013 accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the diagnosed hernia.

  • Decision # 151/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 26, 2015.

  • Decision # 150/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 22, 2016.

  • Decision # 149/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 148/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 147/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's post-accident deemed earning capacity should be $156.00 per week effective November 28, 2000.

  • Decision # 146/17

    Issue: Accident Date: May 5, 2015:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 14, 2015; andAccident Date: June 10, 2016:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 145/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 12, 2016.

  • Decision # 144/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 143/17

    Issue: Date of Accident: August 31, 2016Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andDate of Accident: September 2, 2016Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 142/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 19, 2016.

  • Decision # 141/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss and/or medical aid benefits in relation to the incidents that occurred in March 2016.

  • Decision # 140/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.