Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 134/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 7, 2016.

  • Decision # 133/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 132/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 31, 2016.

  • Decision # 131/17

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 130/17

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right knee difficulties as being a consequence of the April 12, 2012 accident.

  • Decision # 129/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 128/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 127/17

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further costs associated with the rental of a power wheelchair; andWhether or not the worker's escort is entitled to wage loss benefits for May 25, 2016.

  • Decision # 126/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker experienced a recurrence of her psychological difficulties; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 125/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated;Whether or not the worker is entitled to further independent living assistance benefits prior to September 30, 2016; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to personal care assistance benefits prior to September 30, 2016.

  • Decision # 124/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 123/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 122/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 1, 2015.

  • Decision # 121/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 120/17

    Issue: Whether or not the April 21, 2011 effective date for the implementation of cost relief has been properly determined.

  • Decision # 119/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 118/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 117/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 116/17

    Issue: Whether or not the firm should be considered to be the employer of record in relation to a worker's claim for injury occurring April 9, 2015.

  • Decision # 115/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's estate is entitled to additional benefits.

  • Decision # 114/17

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed right middle finger surgery.

  • Decision # 113/17

    Issue: 2013 Claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.2014 Claim:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 112/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current back difficulties are a consequence of the August 10, 1997 accident.

  • Decision # 111/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 110/17

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's meniscus tear as being a consequence of the January 29, 2016 accident.