Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 53/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 52/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 31, 2017; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after December 28, 2017.

  • Decision # 51/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 49/20

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant firm should be considered the deemed employer.

  • Decision # 48/20

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident - April 251996: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated;2. Date of Accident - November 28, 2017: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 47/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 29, 2018.

  • Decision # 46/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 25, 2018.

  • Decision # 44/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after September 14, 2016.

  • Decision # 43/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 11, 2019.

  • Decision # 42/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's restrictions should be made permanent.

  • Decision # 41/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 40/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 39/20

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker requires physical restrictions; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 12, 2016; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 38/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 20, 2019.

  • Decision # 37/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 36/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after February 2, 2018.

  • Decision # 35/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is acceptable as being a consequence of the 2016 and/or 2017 accidents; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 24, 2018.

  • Decision # 34/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period April 8, 2019 to April 12, 2019.

  • Decision # 33/20

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 32/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 8, 2019.

  • Decision # 31/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 17, 2017.

  • Decision # 30/20

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 29/20

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the July 18, 2011 accident.