Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 129/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 128/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s estate is entitled to reimbursement for the Oxyneo medication at a dosage rate of 10 mg three times per day.

  • Decision # 127/23

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer (“Employer”) should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening section 19.1(2) of the WCA.

  • Decision # 126/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's initial weekly wage loss benefit rate has been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 125/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been calculated correctly; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after February 17, 2021.

  • Decision # 124/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 123/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 6.88% and the monetary award of $7,380.00 as established in May 2014 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 122/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 25, 2012; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after September 17, 2012.

  • Decision # 121/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated; 2. Whether or not the worker’s restrictions have been correctly established; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits and services; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 6, 2018.

  • Decision # 120/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 119/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left medial meniscal tear should be accepted as being a consequence of the March 2, 2022 accident.

  • Decision # 118/23

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to 50% cost relief for a pre-existing condition.

  • Decision # 117/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after February 10, 2023.

  • Decision # 116/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for an annual swimming pool pass.

  • Decision # 115/23

    Issue: Date of Accident - April 10, 2013:1. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 2. Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.Date of Accident - October 15, 2016:3. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 4. Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 114/23

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening s 19.1(1) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 113/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid wage loss benefits; and 2. Whether or not the overpayment must be repaid to the WCB.

  • Decision # 112/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for their left rotator cuff tear and subsequent surgery.

  • Decision # 111/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 110/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 109/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 108/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the June 23, 2016 accident.

  • Decision # 107/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s left arm, elbow, shoulder, and neck difficulties are related to the November 22, 2022 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to injuries sustained on November 22, 2022.

  • Decision # 106/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 105/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 2% has been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the worker's monetary award of $2,920.00 for their permanent partial impairment has been correctly calculated.