Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 78/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 5, 2015.

  • Decision # 77/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to travel expenses to attend physiotherapy treatment in Winnipeg.

  • Decision # 76/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further medical aid benefits in relation to his neck and back injuries.

  • Decision # 75/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 74/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a pre-existing condition associated with her right wrist which was affected by the accident;Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left wrist difficulties as being a consequence of the June 17, 2015 accident; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 1.2% for her right wrist condition has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 72/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 70/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for February 22 and 23, 2017.

  • Decision # 69/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 4, 2015.

  • Decision # 68/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 14, 2015.

  • Decision # 67/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 27, 2017.

  • Decision # 66/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 65/18

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's low back difficulties as being a consequence of the October 23, 2013 accident.

  • Decision # 64/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 63/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to her accident of June 10, 2011.

  • Decision # 62/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 12, 2017.

  • Decision # 61/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating for cosmetic disfigurement has been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 60/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's temporary total disability benefits have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 59/18

    Issue: Whether not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 30, 2013.

  • Decision # 57/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further medical aid benefits for physiotherapy and/or vestibular treatment.

  • Decision # 56/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after May 17, 2017.

  • Decision # 55/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the right rotator cuff tear.

  • Decision # 54/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 8, 2016.