Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 84/24

    Issue: Date of Accident - May 8, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the May 8, 2017 accident;Date of Accident - August 28, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 28, 2017 accident;Date of Accident - August 31, 2018: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 31, 2018 accident; andAll Claims: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the cumulative effects of injuries sustained in the May 8, 2017 accident, the August 28, 2017 accident and the August 31, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 83/24

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the right side L4-5 spinal surgery and associated costs.

  • Decision # 82/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s ongoing back complaints are related to the November 20, 2000 accident; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the back injury; and 3. Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity.

  • Decision # 81/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 80/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for recurrent left shoulder difficulties.

  • Decision # 79/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 77/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 15, 2023.

  • Decision # 76/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to the May 2, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 75/24

    Issue: Whether or not the firm's assessable payroll for the years 2009 to 2013 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 74/24

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right hand difficulties as being a consequence of the November 6, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 73/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 72/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 71/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings effective November 5, 2022 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 70/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the diagnosis of Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome.

  • Decision # 69/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 1, 2021.

  • Decision # 68/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the L4-5 disc herniation and/or condition of adjacent segment disease in relation to the October 9, 2017 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 26, 2020.

  • Decision # 67/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid wage loss benefits in the amount of $21,085.43; and 2. Whether or the worker is responsible to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 66/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 10, 2022.

  • Decision # 65/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the November 2, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 64/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period October 28, 2023 to December 7, 2023.

  • Decision # 63/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the July 22, 2010 accident.2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the April 29, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 62/24

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is entitled to cost relief due to a pre-existing condition.

  • Decision # 61/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 60/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.