Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 28/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 27/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits on October 7, 2021.

  • Decision # 26/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for April 14 and 15, 2021.

  • Decision # 25/22

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan for the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 6552, Other customer and information services representatives, is appropriate.

  • Decision # 24/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the March 20, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 23/22

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to additional cost relief.

  • Decision # 22/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to the October 24, 2014 accident.

  • Decision # 20/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 19/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 18/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after August 13, 2020.

  • Decision # 17/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits following his lay-off in 2019.

  • Decision # 16/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid (shock therapy treatment).

  • Decision # 15/22

    Issue: Whether or not there is a relationship between the worker's current difficulties and the October 31, 2008 accident.

  • Decision # 14/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an additional annual clothing allowance.

  • Decision # 12/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after January 28, 2021 in relation to the October 29, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 11/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the February 12, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 10/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to the August 5, 2013 accident.

  • Decision # 08/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 07/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the December 13, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 06/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current right hip difficulties as being a consequence of the August 16, 2019 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award for their left shoulder injury.

  • Decision # 05/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to the May 16, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 04/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 26, 2020 accident.