Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 46/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further treatment with a psychotherapist for EMDR treatment; 2. Whether or not the worker's restrictions have been correctly established; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after July 14, 2020.

  • Decision # 44/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Impairment Award.

  • Decision # 43/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 23, 2021.

  • Decision # 41/23

    Issue: Date of Accident - March 2, 2020:1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the March 2, 2020 accident.Date of Accident - November 21, 2020:2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder surgery in relation to the November 21, 2020 accident; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 2, 2021.

  • Decision # 40/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 29, 2021.

  • Decision # 39/23

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident – November 6, 2014: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits in relation to the November 6, 2014 accident; and 2. Date of Accident – December 14, 2018: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 5, 2021 in relation to the April 25, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 37/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2022 under WCB policy 44.30.60, Notice of Change in Benefits or Services; and 2. Whether or not the worker’s independent living allowance (ILA) is correct.

  • Decision # 36/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 10, 2019 in relation to the November 15, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 35/23

    Issue: Date of Accident - November 2, 2018:1. Whether or not the worker's psychological difficulties occurring in early 2021 should be accepted as a recurrence of the November 2, 2018 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for November 9, 2018 and November 21, 2018 and December 7, 2018 and December 9, 2018.Date of Accident - May 7, 2021: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the left hip condition.

  • Decision # 33/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s back difficulties should be accepted as a recurrence of the January 10, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 32/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 20, 2021 in relation to the July 31, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 31/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s permanent restrictions have been properly determined; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 30/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for an Oticon Edu-Mic.

  • Decision # 29/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for the diagnosis of a left anterior cruciate ligament tear as being related to the April 12, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 28/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating of 3.60% and the monetary award of $4,380.00 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 27/23

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is entitled to cost relief for a pre-existing condition.

  • Decision # 26/23

    Issue: Date of Accident – May 4, 2021:1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 23, 2021 with the exception of physiotherapy treatment in relation to the May 4, 2021 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to physiotherapy treatment after August 11, 2021 in relation to the May 4, 2021 accident.Date of Accident – June 23, 2021:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/23

    Issue: Whether or not the firm operates in a mandatory industry requiring registration with the WCB.

  • Decision # 24/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 23/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 22/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 25, 2019.