Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 137/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 136/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right shoulder supraspinatus tendon tear is a consequence of the September 2, 2015 accident and/or the snow shoveling activities performed on November 19 and 20, 2015;Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 22, 2016.

  • Decision # 135/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further coverage for opioid medication.

  • Decision # 134/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 1, 2016 in relation to the August 9, 2016 accident;Whether or not the claim is acceptable for an accident occurring on December 23, 2016.

  • Decision # 133/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 19, 2017;Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 132/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 131/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after February 19, 2016 to September 21, 2016.

  • Decision # 130/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 129/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 128/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period May 12, 2016 to May 16, 2016.

  • Decision # 127/18

    Issue: Whether or not the return to work program is appropriate;Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 126/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses to attend work after October 6, 2017.

  • Decision # 125/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for massage therapy.

  • Decision # 124/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits in relation to a cubital tunnel release.

  • Decision # 123/18

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 122/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 121/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 120/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 119/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to her psychological injury.

  • Decision # 118/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 31, 2017.

  • Decision # 117/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 23, 2017;Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 116/18

    Issue: March 7, 2017 incident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable.June 16, 2017 incident - Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 115/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 114/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/18

    Issue: Employer Appeal:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Worker Appeal:Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 25, 2016.