Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 98/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee difficulties as being related to the February 4, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 97/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for prescription opioid medication after August 31, 2020.

  • Decision # 95/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 94/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the purchase of a computer/laptop.

  • Decision # 93/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right elbow difficulties after March 8, 2019 in relation to the November 27, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 92/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the proposed dental treatment.

  • Decision # 90/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 14, 2018.

  • Decision # 89/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 22, 2020.

  • Decision # 88/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 86/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 7, 2018 in relation to the January 26, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 85/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s diagnosis of Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and associated symptoms as being related to the June 9, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 83/21

    Issue: Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective June 28, 2020.

  • Decision # 82/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claims are acceptable.

  • Decision # 81/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 80/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 79/21

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/21

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident – November 1, 1995: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current bilateral arm difficulties as being related to the November 1, 1995 accident; and 2. Date of Accident – April 8, 2019: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 77/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment after October 30, 2018.

  • Decision # 76/21

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility can be accepted for the worker's right hand and finger complaints as being related to the May 25, 1990 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 75/21

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left shoulder difficulties as being a consequence of the May 29, 2009 accident; and2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 14, 2014.

  • Decision # 74/21

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s 1% permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly determined.