Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 57/23

    Issue: Whether or not the accident employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening section 19.1(2) of the WCA.

  • Decision # 56/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current upper spine and cervical difficulties as being a consequence of the September 21, 2020 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 55/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 54/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 53/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the March 31, 2021 accident.

  • Decision # 52/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 51/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after October 2, 2021.

  • Decision # 50/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's 3.00% permanent partial impairment rating and $4,500.00 monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 49/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 6.32% has been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the monetary award for the permanent partial impairment of $8,580.00 has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 48/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 47/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after June 2, 2022.

  • Decision # 46/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further treatment with a psychotherapist for EMDR treatment; 2. Whether or not the worker's restrictions have been correctly established; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after July 14, 2020.

  • Decision # 44/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Impairment Award.

  • Decision # 43/23

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after September 23, 2021.

  • Decision # 41/23

    Issue: Date of Accident - March 2, 2020:1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the March 2, 2020 accident.Date of Accident - November 21, 2020:2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right shoulder surgery in relation to the November 21, 2020 accident; and 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 2, 2021.

  • Decision # 40/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 29, 2021.

  • Decision # 39/23

    Issue: 1. Date of Accident – November 6, 2014: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits in relation to the November 6, 2014 accident; and 2. Date of Accident – December 14, 2018: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 5, 2021 in relation to the April 25, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 37/23

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2022 under WCB policy 44.30.60, Notice of Change in Benefits or Services; and 2. Whether or not the worker’s independent living allowance (ILA) is correct.

  • Decision # 36/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 10, 2019 in relation to the November 15, 2017 accident.

  • Decision # 35/23

    Issue: Date of Accident - November 2, 2018:1. Whether or not the worker's psychological difficulties occurring in early 2021 should be accepted as a recurrence of the November 2, 2018 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for November 9, 2018 and November 21, 2018 and December 7, 2018 and December 9, 2018.Date of Accident - May 7, 2021: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the left hip condition.

  • Decision # 33/23

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s back difficulties should be accepted as a recurrence of the January 10, 2020 accident.