Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 102/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after October 22, 2023 in relation to the June 12, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 101/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the October 12, 2022 accident.

  • Decision # 100/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 99/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 28, 2021; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 98/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 6% has been correctly established.

  • Decision # 97/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating of 6% for urinary bladder function and cosmetic disfigurement have been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the monetary award for the impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 95/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 94/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the accounts should be associated in accordance with the provisions of WCB Policies; 2. Whether or not the Group Firm meets the definition of Independent Contractor as defined by the Act; 3. Whether or not the Group Firm is eligible to purchase optional coverage under the Act; and 4. Whether or not the Group Firm should be classified and assigned premium rates associated within the classifications of Building Construction and Heavy Industrial Equipment Sales and Services.

  • Decision # 93/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an annuity.

  • Decision # 92/24

    Issue: Accident of September 1, 2021: Whether or not the claim is acceptableAccident of April 22, 2022: Whether or not the claim is acceptable

  • Decision # 91/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to the January 26, 2024 accident.

  • Decision # 89/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period June 19, 2023 to August 13, 2023.

  • Decision # 88/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s weekly benefit rate of $941.49 effective December 17, 2023 is correct.

  • Decision # 86/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 85/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/24

    Issue: Date of Accident - May 8, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the May 8, 2017 accident;Date of Accident - August 28, 2017: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 28, 2017 accident;Date of Accident - August 31, 2018: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 31, 2018 accident; andAll Claims: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the cumulative effects of injuries sustained in the May 8, 2017 accident, the August 28, 2017 accident and the August 31, 2018 accident.

  • Decision # 83/24

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the right side L4-5 spinal surgery and associated costs.

  • Decision # 82/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s ongoing back complaints are related to the November 20, 2000 accident; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the back injury; and 3. Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity.

  • Decision # 81/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 80/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for recurrent left shoulder difficulties.

  • Decision # 79/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.