Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 53/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the January 3, 2020 accident.

  • Decision # 52/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 51/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after July 22, 2020 in relation to the November 26, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 50/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from March 27, 2021 to April 16, 2021; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 28, 2021 to May 30, 2021.

  • Decision # 49/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s current right shoulder difficulties are related to the January 22, 2008 accident.

  • Decision # 48/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after April 22, 2020.

  • Decision # 47/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 1, 2021.

  • Decision # 46/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility for the worker's lumbar disc herniation should be accepted as being causally related to the February 3, 2020 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 23, 2020.

  • Decision # 45/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's cosmetic permanent partial impairment award has been correctly determined; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for opioid medication.

  • Decision # 44/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker had a further injury subsequent to the March 12, 2013 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 43/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/22

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right total knee replacement as being a consequence of the March 29, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 41/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 13, 2019.

  • Decision # 40/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 12, 2020 in relation to the November 20, 2019 accident.

  • Decision # 39/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the worker’s vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate.

  • Decision # 38/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s back complaints as being related to the July 16, 2013 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker’s partial wage loss benefit rate of $25.33 per week effective August 1, 2021 has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 37/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/22

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/22

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s injections after August 30, 2021.

  • Decision # 33/22

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 32/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of modified duties and a graduated return to work effective August 24, 2020.

  • Decision # 31/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 24, 2018.

  • Decision # 30/22

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid benefits in the amount of $16,859.24; and 2. Whether or not the overpayment must be repaid.

  • Decision # 29/22

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of the overpayment.