Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 18/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 26, 2017.

  • Decision # 17/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 15/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 20, 2016.

  • Decision # 13/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss or medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 12/18

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant firm should be charged 50% of the claim costs in relation to an injury sustained by a worker employed by another firm.

  • Decision # 11/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 10/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 09/18

    Issue: Whether or not the right of action filed by a worker against his employer and two co-workers of the employer is barred pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

  • Decision # 08/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 19, 2015.

  • Decision # 07/18

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 06/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's chipped tooth should be accepted as being a consequence of the compensable injury.Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 2, 2016.

  • Decision # 05/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after February 15, 2016.

  • Decision # 04/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/18

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his right ear.

  • Decision # 02/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/18

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 175/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 174/17

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 173/17

    Issue: Whether or not the right of action is removed pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

  • Decision # 172/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right wrist diagnosis should be accepted as being a consequence of the worker's compensable injuries occurring September 28, 2009, August 15, 2011 or February 11, 2014. Whether or not the worker’s right wrist difficulties should be accepted as being a consequence of the treatment/exercises prescribed to her for any and all of her three compensable injuries.

  • Decision # 171/17

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to custom made footwear; and2. Whether or not the worker's footwear allowance is correct.

  • Decision # 170/17

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after December 4, 2005.

  • Decision # 169/17

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $440.00 per week effective November 5, 2016.