Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 45/24

    Issue: Whether or not the additional PPI rating of 4.08% and the monetary award of $6,250.00 was correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 44/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional chiropractic treatment; and 2. Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective August 6, 2006.

  • Decision # 42/24

    Issue: Whether or not the implementation of a post-accident deemed earning capacity effective April 25, 2022 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 41/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 40/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after November 8, 2023.

  • Decision # 39/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after March 14, 2022.

  • Decision # 38/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability or wage loss benefits following their retirement in 1999.

  • Decision # 37/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/24

    Issue: Whether or not the employer should be assessed a $4,000.00 penalty for contravening section 19.1(1) of the Act.

  • Decision # 35/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to the August 15, 2022 accident.

  • Decision # 34/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits after June 23, 2023.

  • Decision # 32/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 31/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for crowns on teeth 14 and 15.

  • Decision # 30/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after February 15, 2022.

  • Decision # 28/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 27/24

    Issue: Date of Accident - February 2, 2017: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident - January 5, 2018: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident - May 8, 2019: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident - March 23, 2021: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/24

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed left knee surgery.

  • Decision # 25/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 7, 2022.

  • Decision # 24/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after June 13, 2022; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 2, 2022.

  • Decision # 23/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's current independent living allowance has been correctly determined;2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a replacement toilet; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for Robaxacet medication; 4. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's vestibular symptoms as being related to the compensable injury; 5. Whether or not the worker's physical permanent partial impairment rating should be re-assessed at this time; 6. Whether or not the worker’s psychological permanent partial impairment rating should be re-assessed at this time; and 7. Whether or not a medical review panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 22/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 21/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period June 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023.