Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 98/22
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 97/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after June 17, 2020.
-
Decision # 96/22
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of a replacement tractor with a snow blower attachment.
-
Decision # 95/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after November 27, 2020.
-
Decision # 94/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after August 5, 2020.
-
Decision # 93/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after May 17, 2020.
-
Decision # 92/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after October 26, 2021.
-
Decision # 91/22
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 90/22
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 89/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 23, 2012.
-
Decision # 88/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits for recurrent right shoulder difficulties.
-
Decision # 87/22
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 86/22
Issue: Date of Accident - June 10, 2006:1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the September 13, 2019 left wrist surgery as being related to the June 10, 2006 accident; and2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits effective September 13, 2019.Date of Accident - September 13, 2019: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 85/22
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 84/22
Issue: Whether or not the employer should be responsible for 21.08% of the claim costs.
-
Decision # 83/22
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's earning capacity has been correctly calculated; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits.
-
Decision # 82/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker continues to have psychological difficulties related to the accident.
-
Decision # 81/22
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 80/22
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 14, 2014 when they discontinued working; and 2. Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 79/22
Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.
-
Decision # 78/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.
-
Decision # 77/22
Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after January 25, 2019; and 2. Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 76/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for the medications Gabapentin, Diclofenac, Cyclobenzaprine, Duloxetine and Rabeprazole after September 8, 2021.
-
Decision # 75/22
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after June 28, 2021.
-
Decision # 74/22
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current right knee difficulties as being related to the August 1, 2014 accident.