Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 77/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's back problems are related to the March 17, 2003 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 76/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 25, 2003.

  • Decision # 75/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 74/06

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an ongoing independent living allowance; Issue 2: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial disability award was correctly made effective as of the date of his first surgery; Issue 3: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial disability award should be deducted from his Special Additional Compensation benefits; Issue 4: Whether or not the worker's pre-accident wages were correctly calculated; and Issue 5: Whether or not the worker should be paid Special Additional Compensation benefits.

  • Decision # 73/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 72/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to Special Additional Compensation benefits beyond age 65.

  • Decision # 70/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from February 7, 2004 to September 1, 2004, inclusive; Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid between November 30, 2003 and January 5, 2004, inclusive; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid beyond February 6, 2004.

  • Decision # 69/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensable benefits beyond August 20, 2001.

  • Decision # 68/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and coverage for treatment beyond October 18, 2004.

  • Decision # 67/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the osteoarthritic changes in the worker's right knee as being related to the compensable injury of May 15, 1985.

  • Decision # 66/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits beyond January 7, 2005.

  • Decision # 65/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 17, 2003.

  • Decision # 64/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was physically and psychologically capable of working full time in a sedentary job (NOC 6683) at the Manitoba minimum wage effective March 29, 2004.

  • Decision # 63/06

    Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification (hereafter "NOC") 6623, Other Elemental Sales (hereafter "NOC 6623"), was appropriate; and Whether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $290.00 per week (hereafter the "deem") should have been implemented effective June 11, 2005.

  • Decision # 62/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for cosmetic disfigurement.

  • Decision # 61/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 60/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 59/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and services beyond July 26, 2002.

  • Decision # 58/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 30, 2005.

  • Decision # 57/06

    Issue: Whether or not as of August 5, 2000, the worker was fit to work full time in employment that respected his permanent compensable restrictions.

  • Decision # 56/06

    Issue: October 16, 1995 claim Whether or not the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome should be accepted as a temporary aggravation of a pre-existing condition; and July 29, 2004 claim Whether or not the carpal tunnel syndrome is acceptable on this claim as a temporary aggravation of a pre-existing condition, which is now resolved.

  • Decision # 55/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 54/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid; Whether or not the overpayment has to be repaid; and Whether or not the worker can receive a lump sum settlement of her permanent partial impairment award at this time.

  • Decision # 53/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility will be accepted for the costs associated with the July 6, 2004 surgery to the worker's nose.