Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 81/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s generalized large joint arthritis is a sequela of the June 10, 1987 compensable injury; Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act (the “Act”); andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further vocational rehabilitation benefits and services.

  • Decision # 80/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond December 13, 2001.

  • Decision # 79/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s current right upper extremity symptoms should be accepted as a recurrence of her January 26, 2002 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 78/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 3, 2006.

  • Decision # 77/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 30, 2003.

  • Decision # 76/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits starting December 31, 2005.

  • Decision # 75/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s loss of earning capacity beyond July 2005 is related to the compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 22, 2006.

  • Decision # 74/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 72/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beginning June 26, 2006.

  • Decision # 71/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the workplace injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 20, 2004.

  • Decision # 70/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a compensable loss of earning capacity beyond June 25, 2006.

  • Decision # 69/07

    Issue: Whether or not further responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s PTSD beyond July 23, 2003; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond January 20, 2004.

  • Decision # 68/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s recurrent left shoulder difficulties for which surgery was performed on September 3, 2004.

  • Decision # 67/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 66/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 65/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for CTS is acceptable.

  • Decision # 64/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits and services.

  • Decision # 63/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 6, 2006.

  • Decision # 62/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 7, 2006.

  • Decision # 61/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 23, 2006.

  • Decision # 60/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s restrictions are due to the compensable injury.

  • Decision # 59/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 26, 2005.

  • Decision # 58/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s restrictions beyond January 12, 2006 are required as a direct result of the 2004 and 2005 compensable accidents.

  • Decision # 57/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s anterior cruciate ligament tear; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 28, 2005.