Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 15/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 4, 2005;Whether or not the worker is overpaid wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker must repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 14/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right index finger symptoms should be accepted as a consequence of the January 10, 2005 right elbow surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 27, 2006.

  • Decision # 11/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 11, 2003.

  • Decision # 10/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 31, 2005.

  • Decision # 08/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 08/07

    Issue: Whether or not the time for appealing the decision refusing compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 07/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a rateable hearing loss condition that would entitle him to a permanent partial disability award; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for tinnitus.

  • Decision # 06/07

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.

  • Decision # 05/07

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant had coverage under the Act at the time of his May 19, 1989 myocardial infarction.

  • Decision # 05/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 04/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 21, 2004.

  • Decision # 04/07

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 8, 2005.

  • Decision # 03/07

    Issue: Whether or not the victim’s claim under The Criminal Injuries Compensation Act is subject to a financial cap in relation to the provision of psychological counselling services.

  • Decision # 02/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/07

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 24, 2006.

  • Decision # 01/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 204/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee problem beyond January 13, 2004; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the September 1, 2005 right knee surgery.