Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 172/07

    Issue: Issue #1:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits. Issue #2:Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right carpal tunnel syndrome and right epicondylitis.

  • Decision # 171/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond October 12, 2006.

  • Decision # 170/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period September 27, 2005 to December 8, 2005 inclusive.

  • Decision # 169/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 168/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 17, 2006.

  • Decision # 167/07

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 19, 2007.

  • Decision # 166/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 9, 2003.

  • Decision # 165/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be provided with a whirlpool tub.

  • Decision # 164/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for January 11 and January 12, 2007.

  • Decision # 163/07

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is required to pay the additional assessment due to the under reporting of resident member of family coverage.

  • Decision # 162/07

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; Whether or not the worker has any additional entitlement flowing from a psychological condition or psychiatric disorder; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation assistance.

  • Decision # 161/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is required to provide the WCB with medical documentation to support his entitlement to footwear and orthotics after January 6, 2006.

  • Decision # 160/07

    Issue: Whether or not vocational rehabilitation services should be extended beyond July 30, 2006.

  • Decision # 159/07

    Issue: Whether or not the Individualized Written Rehabilitation Plan was appropriate; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits subsequent to September 19, 2005.

  • Decision # 158/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 157/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 156/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between July 14, 2006 and September 14, 2006.

  • Decision # 155/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond November 20, 2006.

  • Decision # 154/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 153/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 152/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond January 2, 2006.

  • Decision # 151/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 150/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective May 2, 2001;Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s psychological condition and associated treatment including prescriptions;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 29, 2005;Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid treatment consisting of acupuncture, soft tissue therapy, relaxation coaching and postural retraining prior to the November 15, 2006 Review Office decision; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation services.

  • Decision # 149/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits.

  • Decision # 148/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is required to repay $34,832.00 of his overpayment; andWhether or not the effective date of the worker’s permanent partial disability award has been correctly established as of October 1, 1992.