Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 55/08

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 54/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond September 15, 2006.

  • Decision # 53/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond July 17, 2006.

  • Decision # 52/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 11, 2007.

  • Decision # 51/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 49/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 23, 2005.

  • Decision # 48/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 9, 2007.

  • Decision # 47/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of benefits issued from August 4 to August 20, 2006.

  • Decision # 46/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s deemed post accident earning capacity should be $7.00 per hour for a 40 hour week.

  • Decision # 44/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right rotator cuff tear is related to the compensable injury of December 5, 2000.

  • Decision # 43/08

    Issue: Whether or not a causal relationship exists between the worker’s left wrist osteoarthritis and a fall at work and/or the general nature of the employment duties.

  • Decision # 42/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/08

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with an occupational goal of working within NOC 6661 (Light Duty Cleaning) was appropriate; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 17, 2003; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits during the period of recovery from her left carpal tunnel syndrome surgery.

  • Decision # 40/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 12, 2005.

  • Decision # 39/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s wage loss benefits should have been suspended after June 27, 2005; andWhether or not a deemed post accident earning capacity of $304.00 per week should have been implemented effective January 9, 2007.

  • Decision # 37/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond May 15, 2005; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond August 15, 2006.

  • Decision # 36/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award in recognition of his noise induced hearing loss.

  • Decision # 35/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further treatment and wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 33/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s Permanent Partial Disability award has been correctly established at 3%.

  • Decision # 32/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 31/08

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further physiotherapy treatment.