Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 65/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for CTS is acceptable.

  • Decision # 64/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits and services.

  • Decision # 63/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 6, 2006.

  • Decision # 62/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 7, 2006.

  • Decision # 61/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 23, 2006.

  • Decision # 60/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s restrictions are due to the compensable injury.

  • Decision # 59/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 26, 2005.

  • Decision # 58/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s restrictions beyond January 12, 2006 are required as a direct result of the 2004 and 2005 compensable accidents.

  • Decision # 57/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s anterior cruciate ligament tear; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 28, 2005.

  • Decision # 56/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2004.

  • Decision # 55/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits to November 20, 2004.

  • Decision # 54/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker requires physical or psychological restrictions in relation to the compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 2, 2005.

  • Decision # 53/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings should be $178.79 per week effective January 27, 2005.

  • Decision # 52/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 6, 2003.

  • Decision # 51/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 50/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s depression; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 28, 2005.

  • Decision # 49/07

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity, retroactive to December 1, 2001.

  • Decision # 48/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s L5-S1 back problems are related to the October 1993 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 47/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 7, 2005 as a direct consequence of his February 6, 2003 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker’s vocational rehabilitation benefits and services should be provided as a direct consequence of the compensable injury rather than on a preventive basis.

  • Decision # 46/07

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to retraining.

  • Decision # 45/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits on ‘the direct basis of the claim’ as that phrase is used in the decision of the Manitoba Court of Appeal in relation to this matter;Whether or not the shoulder condition was sustained in an accident in the course of employment; and,Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 16, 1993.

  • Decision # 43/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 10, 2006.

  • Decision # 41/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings and wage loss benefits were correctly calculated.