Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 40/07

    Issue: Whether or not the $225.00 late reporting penalty charged against the employer should be waived.

  • Decision # 39/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an independent living allowance beyond May 30, 2006.

  • Decision # 38/07

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond July 6, 2005; andIssue 2: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further snow removal.

  • Decision # 37/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 13, 2006.

  • Decision # 34/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid beyond December 30, 2005.

  • Decision # 32/07

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should cover the cost of a Tempur-pedic mattress.

  • Decision # 31/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond February 24, 2005.

  • Decision # 30/07

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief or cost transfer.

  • Decision # 29/07

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not the worker is entitled to the payment of full wage loss benefits for the period December 30, 2005 to May 1, 2006;Issue 2: Whether or not the worker’s entitlement to full wage loss benefits effective May 2, 2006 should be contingent upon her full participation in a vocational rehabilitation program;Issue 3: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a mileage allowance to attend appointments in her local community; andIssue 4: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an Independent Living Allowance beyond May 2004.

  • Decision # 28/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 24, 2005.

  • Decision # 27/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/07

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage based on a 40 hour work week, effective October 16, 2003; andWhether or not time constraints should be placed on psychological/psychiatric interventions and medications.

  • Decision # 25/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 24/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 23/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was overpaid $12,940.36; andWhether or not $6,858.12 of the overpayment must be repaid to the WCB.

  • Decision # 22/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/07

    Issue: Whether or not there is a relationship between the worker’s neck symptoms and the March 24, 2004 injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to physiotherapy treatment and related expenses beyond December 10, 2004.

  • Decision # 20/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective May 27, 2003.

  • Decision # 19/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for relocation and travel expenses.

  • Decision # 18/07

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is responsible to pay additional assessment charges and over/under interest charges due to contract labour not reported to the WCB.

  • Decision # 17/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 8, 2005; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid beyond August 10, 2005.

  • Decision # 16/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.