Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 106/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits beyond February 28, 1985 due to the compensable psychological condition.

  • Decision # 105/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 104/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 21, 2005.

  • Decision # 103/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his PPD award.

  • Decision # 102/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s bilateral rotator cuff tears are related to the compensable injuries of May 13, 2003, October 27, 1994 and/or January 31, 1989.

  • Decision # 101/07

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act; and,Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 7, 2005.

  • Decision # 100/07

    Issue: Whether or not the 1% Permanent Partial Impairment award and the corresponding $640.00 lump sum settlement have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 99/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the injuries sustained by the worker in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on January 24, 2007.

  • Decision # 97/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 5, 2006.

  • Decision # 95/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cost of reinstalling a jetted tub and fireplace.

  • Decision # 94/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 93/07

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act ("the Act").

  • Decision # 92/07

    Issue: Whether or not the firm’s activities are correctly classified under industry sub-group 310-03 “Metal Working Plant”.

  • Decision # 91/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from July 17, 2006 to August 22, 2006.

  • Decision # 90/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 10, 2006.

  • Decision # 89/07

    Issue: Whether or not the lateral meniscus cyst which was surgically removed on September 29, 1999 was caused by the January 16, 1998 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker’s bilateral knee restrictions have been correctly established as being required on a preventive basis rather than as a direct result of the January 16, 1998 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between February 17, 2001 and September 9, 2001.

  • Decision # 88/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 21, 2006.

  • Decision # 87/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 8, 2000.

  • Decision # 86/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits and services beyond January 10, 2003.

  • Decision # 85/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond July 29, 2005; andWhether or not the worker’s sleep disorder is related to the compensable injury.

  • Decision # 84/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was overpaid; andWhether or not the overpayment must be repaid.

  • Decision # 83/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for a traumatic hearing loss occurring on February 21, 1985 is acceptable; andWhether or not the claim for a non-specific noise induced hearing loss is acceptable.

  • Decision # 82/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.