Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 153/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s current back complaints are related to the 1993 or 1997 compensable injuries.
-
Decision # 152/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his permanent partial disability award.
-
Decision # 151/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for his time loss from work commencing May 5, 2005; and,Whether or not the worker’s wage loss benefits should have been reinstated effective October 13, 2005.
-
Decision # 150/06
Issue: Whether or not the employer is required to register as a compulsory business under the Act.
-
Decision # 149/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 148/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 147/06
Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 146/06
Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable from December 16, 2005 to January 8, 2006 inclusive.
-
Decision # 145/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s Permanent Partial Impairment rating adequately reflects the degree of impairment for his compensable injury.
-
Decision # 144/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment for his hearing loss has been correctly rated at 0.95%; and,Whether or not the financial value of the impairment award has been properly calculated.
-
Decision # 143/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 142/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 141/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 140/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits and services beyond February 5, 2005.
-
Decision # 139/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker's problems with her neck, right shoulder, arm, wrist, back and hip are related to the March 10, 1985 or February 9, 1986 compensable injuries; and, Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for medical aid treatment after December 7, 1988.
-
Decision # 138/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond October 8, 2004.
-
Decision # 137/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing October 17, 2003 in relation to her compensable throat injury of March 31, 2003.
-
Decision # 136/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid beyond November 4, 2005.
-
Decision # 135/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 22, 2005.
-
Decision # 134/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 19, 2005; and, Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment subsequent to July 28, 2005.
-
Decision # 133/06
Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification 1453, Customer Service, Information and Related Clerks, is appropriate; and Whether or not an earning capacity of $379.00 per week should have been implemented as of March 1, 2004.
-
Decision # 132/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing April 25, 2002.
-
Decision # 131/06
Issue: Whether or not financial responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of an ankle exercising machine.
-
Decision # 130/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond April 26, 2002.
-
Decision # 129/06
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment beyond December 5, 2003, in relation to the October 7, 2003 compensable injury.