Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 23/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was overpaid $12,940.36; andWhether or not $6,858.12 of the overpayment must be repaid to the WCB.

  • Decision # 22/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/07

    Issue: Whether or not there is a relationship between the worker’s neck symptoms and the March 24, 2004 injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to physiotherapy treatment and related expenses beyond December 10, 2004.

  • Decision # 20/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective May 27, 2003.

  • Decision # 19/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for relocation and travel expenses.

  • Decision # 18/07

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is responsible to pay additional assessment charges and over/under interest charges due to contract labour not reported to the WCB.

  • Decision # 17/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 8, 2005; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid beyond August 10, 2005.

  • Decision # 16/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 15/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after June 4, 2005;Whether or not the worker is overpaid wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker must repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 14/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right index finger symptoms should be accepted as a consequence of the January 10, 2005 right elbow surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 27, 2006.

  • Decision # 11/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 11, 2003.

  • Decision # 10/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 31, 2005.

  • Decision # 08/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 08/07

    Issue: Whether or not the time for appealing the decision refusing compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 07/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a rateable hearing loss condition that would entitle him to a permanent partial disability award; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for tinnitus.

  • Decision # 06/07

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.

  • Decision # 05/07

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant had coverage under the Act at the time of his May 19, 1989 myocardial infarction.

  • Decision # 05/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 04/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 21, 2004.