Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 04/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current back complaints or for the proposed surgery to her back.

  • Decision # 04/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 03/06

    Issue: Whether or not the victim's wage loss benefit was properly calculated for the period November 2001 to June 2003.

  • Decision # 03/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/06

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.

  • Decision # 01/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should have been deemed capable of earning minimum wage after September 17, 2003.

  • Decision # 194/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 193/05

    Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within NOC 1453 - Customer Service was appropriate; and Whether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $382.00 per week should have been implemented effective May 28, 2005.

  • Decision # 192/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 191/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 190/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 189/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 188/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current mental health difficulties are related to the compensable injury of July 16, 2003.

  • Decision # 187/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond May 20, 2005.

  • Decision # 186/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between August 6, 2004 and December 19, 2004 inclusive.

  • Decision # 185/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility can be accepted for the worker's ongoing right foot complaints in relation to the February 27, 1995 compensable accident; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 184/05

    Issue: Worker's Issues: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 7, 2002; and Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed for the cost of a tilt board. Employer's Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 183/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has achieved a functional recovery from the effects of his compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond August 17, 2004.

  • Decision # 182/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 181/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond October 13, 2004.

  • Decision # 180/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the November 18, 1999 compensable injury by February 26, 2002; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from February 26, 2002 to March 3, 2002.

  • Decision # 179/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond June 23, 2004.

  • Decision # 178/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was offered suitable alternate duty work; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits during his absence from work.