Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 82/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's ongoing difficulties commencing in January 2004 as being related to the March 11, 2003 compensable accident; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's depressive condition.

  • Decision # 81/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's pre-existing condition was enhanced or accelerated by the compensable injuries of January 18, 2001 and July 23, 2001.

  • Decision # 80/05

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits should have been discontinued effective May 31, 2004.

  • Decision # 79/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right carpal tunnel syndrome, associated surgery and time loss in relation to the October 30, 2002 compensable right thumb injury.

  • Decision # 78/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 11, 2003.

  • Decision # 77/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 14, 2003.

  • Decision # 76/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 75/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period November 27, 2001 to July 31, 2002, inclusive.

  • Decision # 74/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/05

    Issue: Whether or not the April 27, 1998 date of accident is correct; and Whether or not there is entitlement to a permanent partial impairment award for tinnitus.

  • Decision # 72/05

    Issue: Whether or not the compensable injury of July 12, 1999 caused an exacerbation of the worker's pre-existing medical condition of multiple sclerosis; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond November 9, 2000.

  • Decision # 71/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 70/05

    Issue: Whether or not the monetary value of the worker's 10% permanent partial impairment award has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 69/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 5, 2004; and Whether or not there has been an overpayment of benefits.

  • Decision # 68/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 67/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker had recovered from the effects of her compensable injury by July 24, 2003.

  • Decision # 66/05

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond August 6, 2004.

  • Decision # 65/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits beyond December 7, 2003.

  • Decision # 64/05

    Issue: Whether or not the restriction to avoid the cold is required as a direct result of the compensable left knee claim; Whether or not there should be further entitlement to medical aid benefits and services for the left knee condition; and, Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 2, 2003.

  • Decision # 63/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 28, 2004.

  • Decision # 62/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's complaints beyond November 2002 are related to the workplace injury of April 29, 2002; and Whether or not the worker sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment on February 6, 2003.

  • Decision # 61/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further Special Additional Compensation benefits or other WCB benefits and services.

  • Decision # 60/05

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should consider deemed workers based on the 2000 audit as partners under the partnership of the firm of record; Whether or not the WCB should consider deemed workers based on the 2001 audit as partners under the partnership of the firm of record; Whether or not the WCB should consider deemed workers based on the 2002 audit as partners under the partnership of the firm of record; and Whether or not the firm of record should be considered a worker of any general contractor engaging their services, effective January 1, 2003.

  • Decision # 59/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.