Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 136/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid beyond November 4, 2005.

  • Decision # 135/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 22, 2005.

  • Decision # 134/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 19, 2005; and, Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment subsequent to July 28, 2005.

  • Decision # 133/06

    Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification 1453, Customer Service, Information and Related Clerks, is appropriate; and Whether or not an earning capacity of $379.00 per week should have been implemented as of March 1, 2004.

  • Decision # 132/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing April 25, 2002.

  • Decision # 131/06

    Issue: Whether or not financial responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of an ankle exercising machine.

  • Decision # 130/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond April 26, 2002.

  • Decision # 129/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment beyond December 5, 2003, in relation to the October 7, 2003 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 128/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional travel expenses; and, Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 127/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 126/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and services beyond March 27, 2000; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to preventive vocational rehabilitation.

  • Decision # 125/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the June 8, 2004 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 124/06

    Issue: Whether or not the appellant was a worker as defined by the Act at the time of the August 29, 2002 accident.

  • Decision # 123/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be calculated at $295.47 per week.

  • Decision # 122/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 121/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's ongoing lower back complaints.

  • Decision # 120/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 3, 2006 in relation to the September 2, 2005 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 119/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the May 10, 2002 workplace injury.

  • Decision # 118/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of his compensable injury.

  • Decision # 117/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome and/or cubital tunnel syndrome are related to the compensable injury of March 10, 2003; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 23, 2004.

  • Decision # 116/06

    Issue: Whether or not the right of action is removed pursuant to the provisions of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 115/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right wrist problems and associated surgery of October 28, 2005.

  • Decision # 114/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing back problems are related to the compensable injuries of July 1 and August 17, 2004.

  • Decision # 113/06

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment beyond December 19, 1991; and Issue 2: Whether or not the Permanent Partial Disability rating in regard to the worker's left knee should be implemented; and Issue 3: Whether or not the left knee range of motion should be used as a comparison in determining the Permanent Partial Disability rating of the right knee; and Issue 4: Whether or not surgery and ongoing treatment of the left shoulder is related to the 1981 compensable injury; and Issue 5: Whether or not the worker's myocardial infarction is related to the 1981 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 112/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.