Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 32/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 31/05

    Issue: 1. Whether or not there is evidence of a compensable chronic pain syndrome that requires treatment; 2. Whether or not the identified physical restrictions are appropriate; 3. Whether or not the worker's bladder difficulties are related to the March 4, 1986 compensable injury; and 4. Whether or not the worker's Permanent Partial Disability award should be reassessed at this time.

  • Decision # 30/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/05

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should provide the claimant with legal assistance in the matter of the dissolution of his relationship.

  • Decision # 27/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was entitled to receive wage loss benefits for the period April 23 to May 25, 2004.

  • Decision # 26/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 26, 2003.

  • Decision # 25/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond July 17, 2000.

  • Decision # 24/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for any time loss or medical expenses beyond January 14, 2002; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 23/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 22/05

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment rating of 5% is correct; and Whether or not the monetary award of $1,104.00 is correct.

  • Decision # 21/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 9, 2000.

  • Decision # 20/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between April 21, 2003 and May 30, 2003.

  • Decision # 19/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 27, 2003.

  • Decision # 18/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 1, 2002.

  • Decision # 16/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's back condition, including medical treatment and/or wage loss benefits in relation to the May 26, 2004 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 15/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of an Independent Living Allowance beyond October 1, 2004.

  • Decision # 11/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 10/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 7, 2003.

  • Decision # 09/05

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should cover the costs of a professional note taker for any of the worker's university courses.

  • Decision # 08/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed right knee surgery.