Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 48/06

    Issue: Employer's Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable. Worker's Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from October 14, 2004 to January 3, 2005 and beyond January 6, 2005.

  • Decision # 47/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 46/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an independent living allowance.

  • Decision # 45/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 21, 2001.

  • Decision # 44/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the January 7, 2003 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 43/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 29, 2004.

  • Decision # 42/06

    Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification (hereafter "NOC") 7412 is appropriate; and Whether or not the deemed post-accident earning capacity of $525.00 per week is appropriate.

  • Decision # 41/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 40/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the conditions of left carpal tunnel syndrome and left ulnar neuropathy as being related to the compensable left shoulder injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss beyond July 25, 2004.

  • Decision # 39/06

    Issue: Whether or not there is a relationship between the injury of September 2003 and the worker's current symptoms.

  • Decision # 38/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for injuries sustained on May 30, 2003 is acceptable; and Whether or not the claim for injuries sustained on November 23, 2000 is acceptable.

  • Decision # 37/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional vocational rehabilitation services.

  • Decision # 33/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits after September 10, 2000.

  • Decision # 32/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the September 1, 2004 compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond February 25, 2005.

  • Decision # 31/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right elbow/arm/hand symptoms as being related to the August 1, 2001 compensable accident; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 15, 2004.

  • Decision # 30/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between May 24, 2003 and September 2, 2003; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2005.

  • Decision # 29/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 26, 2005.

  • Decision # 28/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right wrist problems as a consequence of the left wrist/forearm injury of May 1, 2001.

  • Decision # 27/06

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 9, 2004.

  • Decision # 26/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for a left knee injury occurring either October 25, 2000 or about June/July 2003 is acceptable; and Whether or not a relationship can be established between the worker's left knee condition and the compensable injuries involving the right ankle and right knee.

  • Decision # 25/06

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act (the "Act"), and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 6, 2005.

  • Decision # 24/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's headaches, neck and/or right shoulder problems; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between August 20, 2004 and September 6, 2004; Whether or not physiotherapy treatments should be extended; and Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of her compensable injury.