Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 103/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's Permanent Partial Impairment Award should be reduced by 50%.

  • Decision # 102/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an ongoing monthly Independent Living Allowance; Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits for the period he was awaiting a return to work; and Whether or not the worker should be compensated for missed employer pension and long term disability premiums.

  • Decision # 101/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 5, 2003.

  • Decision # 100/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be used when calculating her loss of earning capacity; and Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be $299.30 per week.

  • Decision # 99/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing September 8, 2002; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 98/05

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel must be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 24, 2003.

  • Decision # 97/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 2, 2003.

  • Decision # 96/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's entitlement to vocational rehabilitation assistance (defined as wage loss and/or services) should have been suspended subsequent to October 25, 2002; and Whether or not the worker has a total loss of earning capacity beyond May 28, 2003 due to his wrist injury.

  • Decision # 95/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right knee injury of January 5, 2004 should be accepted on this claim.

  • Decision # 94/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left hip difficulties are related to the August 25, 2003 compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 28, 2004.

  • Decision # 93/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond June 8, 2003.

  • Decision # 92/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services.

  • Decision # 91/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 15, 2003; and Whether or not there is entitlement to reimbursement of medical aid expenses beyond November 25, 2003.

  • Decision # 89/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits or services beyond August 30, 2004.

  • Decision # 88/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 20, 2004.

  • Decision # 87/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from December 22, 2003 to January 7, 2004; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 22, 2004.

  • Decision # 86/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's neck condition and associated treatment as being related to the May 25, 1990 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 85/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing depressive symptoms are considered to be related to the compensable injury; Whether or not the worker has physically recovered from the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome condition; and Whether or not the worker's right elbow problems are related to the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome claim.

  • Decision # 83/05

    Issue: Whether or not the relocation expenses from Malartic to St. Martyrs should be reimbursed by the WCB; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for wood cutting expenses.

  • Decision # 82/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's ongoing difficulties commencing in January 2004 as being related to the March 11, 2003 compensable accident; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's depressive condition.

  • Decision # 81/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's pre-existing condition was enhanced or accelerated by the compensable injuries of January 18, 2001 and July 23, 2001.

  • Decision # 80/05

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits should have been discontinued effective May 31, 2004.

  • Decision # 79/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right carpal tunnel syndrome, associated surgery and time loss in relation to the October 30, 2002 compensable right thumb injury.