Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 134/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 133/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 21, 2003.

  • Decision # 132/04

    Issue: Whether or not the $150.00 penalty for late reporting should be assessed against the employer.

  • Decision # 131/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 4, 2003.

  • Decision # 130/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is employable in relation to the physical injuries sustained; and Whether or not the claimant's deemed post accident earning capacity is appropriate in relation to the physical injuries sustained.

  • Decision # 129/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel must be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act, to respond to questions regarding the etiology of the worker's tendonitis and carpal tunnel syndrome.

  • Decision # 128/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to the payment of wage loss benefits beyond November 19, 2003; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's psychological condition beyond the two post November 19, 2003 treatments.

  • Decision # 127/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for medical treatment and time loss from work beyond June 2002.

  • Decision # 126/04

    Issue: 1. Whether or not R.C. is a deemed worker of the firm for 1998, 2000 and 2001 whose earnings must be reported to the WCB for assessment and claim purposes; 2. Whether or not O.S. is a deemed worker of the firm for 2002 whose earnings must be reported to the WCB for assessment and claim purposes; 3. Whether or not the firm must pay the WCB $1,919.04 in over-under interest charges; 4. Whether or not the firm must pay the WCB $3,767.62 in inadequate return penalties; and 5. Whether or not the firm must pay the WCB $3,143.61 in late payment penalties.

  • Decision # 125/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 124/04

    Issue: Whether or not the bilateral cubital tunnel syndrome arose out of and in the course of the worker's employment.

  • Decision # 123/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 10, 1998.

  • Decision # 122/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 6, 2000.

  • Decision # 121/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond September 16, 1998.

  • Decision # 120/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 119/04

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits paid between November 1, 2003 and May 6, 2004 should be reduced based on a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage.

  • Decision # 118/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 117/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under Section 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act (the Act).

  • Decision # 116/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 8, 2003.

  • Decision # 115/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid benefits beyond March 25, 2002.

  • Decision # 114/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's current difficulties and related treatment.

  • Decision # 112/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 111/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits for the period July 11, 2002 to July 26, 2002.

  • Decision # 110/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid beyond September 1, 2002.