Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 94/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits beyond February 20, 2005.

  • Decision # 93/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 10, 2004; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits beyond February 14, 2005.

  • Decision # 92/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's bilateral hand condition beyond April 14, 2005.

  • Decision # 89/06

    Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification 6421, Retail Sales Person and Sales Clerk, is appropriate.

  • Decision # 88/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 87/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 29, 2004.

  • Decision # 86/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed for the full traveling distance to Winnipeg to attend his chiropractor.

  • Decision # 85/06

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's liver failure and transplant; Issue 2: Whether or not the employer is entitled to 100 percent cost relief.

  • Decision # 84/06

    Issue: Whether or not the current dental treatment the worker is receiving to her front teeth is related to the April 11, 1989 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 83/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 82/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the arthroscopic surgery and the subsequent time loss from work.

  • Decision # 81/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be $425.15 per week.

  • Decision # 80/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Disability (hereafter "PPD") Award in relation to his facial condition.

  • Decision # 79/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits or services beyond May 18, 2004; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 78/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 77/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's back problems are related to the March 17, 2003 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 76/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 25, 2003.

  • Decision # 75/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 74/06

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an ongoing independent living allowance; Issue 2: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial disability award was correctly made effective as of the date of his first surgery; Issue 3: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial disability award should be deducted from his Special Additional Compensation benefits; Issue 4: Whether or not the worker's pre-accident wages were correctly calculated; and Issue 5: Whether or not the worker should be paid Special Additional Compensation benefits.

  • Decision # 73/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 72/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 71/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to Special Additional Compensation benefits beyond age 65.

  • Decision # 70/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from February 7, 2004 to September 1, 2004, inclusive; Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid between November 30, 2003 and January 5, 2004, inclusive; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid beyond February 6, 2004.