Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 107/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and services beyond April 9, 2004.

  • Decision # 106/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 105/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should have been suspended effective June 16, 2004 on the basis that the worker was fit to participate in the graduated return to work program.

  • Decision # 104/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 6, 2003; Whether or not further responsibility should be accepted for medical treatment or other services in relation to either the August 2002 or October 2000 compensable injuries; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to preventive vocational rehabilitation services.

  • Decision # 103/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's Permanent Partial Impairment Award should be reduced by 50%.

  • Decision # 102/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an ongoing monthly Independent Living Allowance; Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits for the period he was awaiting a return to work; and Whether or not the worker should be compensated for missed employer pension and long term disability premiums.

  • Decision # 101/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 5, 2003.

  • Decision # 100/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be used when calculating her loss of earning capacity; and Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be $299.30 per week.

  • Decision # 99/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing September 8, 2002; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 98/05

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel must be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 24, 2003.

  • Decision # 97/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 2, 2003.

  • Decision # 96/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's entitlement to vocational rehabilitation assistance (defined as wage loss and/or services) should have been suspended subsequent to October 25, 2002; and Whether or not the worker has a total loss of earning capacity beyond May 28, 2003 due to his wrist injury.

  • Decision # 95/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right knee injury of January 5, 2004 should be accepted on this claim.

  • Decision # 94/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left hip difficulties are related to the August 25, 2003 compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 28, 2004.

  • Decision # 93/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond June 8, 2003.

  • Decision # 92/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services.

  • Decision # 91/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 15, 2003; and Whether or not there is entitlement to reimbursement of medical aid expenses beyond November 25, 2003.

  • Decision # 89/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits or services beyond August 30, 2004.

  • Decision # 88/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 20, 2004.

  • Decision # 87/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from December 22, 2003 to January 7, 2004; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 22, 2004.

  • Decision # 86/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's neck condition and associated treatment as being related to the May 25, 1990 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 85/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing depressive symptoms are considered to be related to the compensable injury; Whether or not the worker has physically recovered from the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome condition; and Whether or not the worker's right elbow problems are related to the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome claim.

  • Decision # 83/05

    Issue: Whether or not the relocation expenses from Malartic to St. Martyrs should be reimbursed by the WCB; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for wood cutting expenses.