Decision #180/06 - Type: Workers Compensation

Preamble

A file review was held on October 4, 2006, at the request of the worker.

Issue

Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 17, 2006.

Decision

That the worker is not entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 17, 2006.

Decision: Unanimous

Background

The worker injured his right hand and wrist during the course of his employment on May 17, 2004. The Workers Compensation Board (WCB) accepted responsibility for the claim and wage loss benefits were issued to the worker.

At the time of the injury the worker was 65 years of age. On April 13, 2006, a WCB case manager advised the worker that his wage loss benefits would end effective May 17, 2006 in accordance with subsection 39(3) of The Workers Compensation Act (the Act) which states,

“Where a worker is 63 years of age or older at the commencement of his or her loss of earning capacity, the board may pay the wage loss benefits for a period of not more than 24 months following the date of the accident.”

On June 13, 2006, the worker appealed the above decision to Review Office. He asserted that it was unfair that his benefits were terminated due to his age, given that he continued to experience pain and had limited function in his right hand. His injury restricted his ability to perform yard work, household maintenance and certain recreational activities.

In a decision dated June 16, 2006, Review Office upheld the case manager’s decision. It concluded that it was bound by subsection 39(3) of the Act and that the worker was not entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 17, 2006. On July 11, 2006, the worker appealed Review Office’s decision and a file review was arranged.

Reasons

The panel is satisfied that the decisions made by the case manager and Review Office were correct. Subsection 39(3) of the Act provides to a worker who is 63 years of age or older a maximum of 24 months of wage loss benefits from the date of the accident. In this instance the worker was 65 years of age on May 17, 2004 when the accident occurred. Accordingly, benefits could not be extended to the worker beyond May 17, 2006, notwithstanding that the worker continues to experience pain and disability resulting from the accident. While the panel is sympathetic to the worker in the circumstances, we are bound by the clear wording of subsection 39(3) of the Act . It does not allow for any discretionary wage loss benefits beyond the 24 month period that is mandated in the legislation. The appeal is therefore denied.

Panel Members

K. Dangerfield, Presiding Officer
A. Finkel, Commissioner
M. Day, Commissioner

Recording Secretary, B. Kosc

K. Dangerfield - Presiding Officer
(on behalf of the panel)

Signed at Winnipeg this 22nd day of November, 2006

Back