Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

• Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
• If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
• If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
• If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
• Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
• Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.

Signed between January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 and January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990

Show decisions matching

Decision Type All decisions Workers Compensation Victims' Rights

Search

• Decision # 27/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 9, 2004.

• Decision # 26/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim for a left knee injury occurring either October 25, 2000 or about June/July 2003 is acceptable; and Whether or not a relationship can be established between the worker's left knee condition and the compensable injuries involving the right ankle and right knee.

• Decision # 25/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act (the "Act"), and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 6, 2005.

• Decision # 24/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's headaches, neck and/or right shoulder problems; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between August 20, 2004 and September 6, 2004; Whether or not physiotherapy treatments should be extended; and Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of her compensable injury.

• Decision # 23/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an Independent Living Allowance beyond October 2004.

• Decision # 22/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 21/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker's fall at home was a secondary accident related to the compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period September 23, 2004 to December 19, 2004.

• Decision # 20/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 4, 2005.

• Decision # 19/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment in relation to the September 19, 2001 compensable injury.

• Decision # 18/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for time loss from work commencing September 13, 1999.

• Decision # 17/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker's left hip and low back condition is related to the compensable injury of April 5, 2000.

• Decision # 16/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 20, 2000; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for physiotherapy treatment beyond September 2000; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the March 2002 purchase of a Saunders Sacroiliac Belt; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the out of province medical treatment.

• Decision # 15/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 14/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility for wage loss benefits and medical treatment should be extended beyond August 30, 2004.

• Decision # 13/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 12/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cervical radiculopathy.

• Decision # 11/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed wrist surgery.

• Decision # 10/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker was capable of performing her pre-accident duties as of August 2, 2002.

• Decision # 09/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond July 10, 2001.

• Decision # 08/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 07/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the knee surgery and subsequent time loss from work.

• Decision # 06/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits.

• Decision # 06/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

• Decision # 05/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

• Decision # 05/06
  

  Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.