Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 48/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s L5-S1 back problems are related to the October 1993 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 47/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 7, 2005 as a direct consequence of his February 6, 2003 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker’s vocational rehabilitation benefits and services should be provided as a direct consequence of the compensable injury rather than on a preventive basis.

  • Decision # 46/07

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to retraining.

  • Decision # 45/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits on ‘the direct basis of the claim’ as that phrase is used in the decision of the Manitoba Court of Appeal in relation to this matter;Whether or not the shoulder condition was sustained in an accident in the course of employment; and,Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after July 16, 1993.

  • Decision # 43/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 10, 2006.

  • Decision # 41/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings and wage loss benefits were correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 40/07

    Issue: Whether or not the $225.00 late reporting penalty charged against the employer should be waived.

  • Decision # 39/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an independent living allowance beyond May 30, 2006.

  • Decision # 38/07

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond July 6, 2005; andIssue 2: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further snow removal.

  • Decision # 37/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 13, 2006.

  • Decision # 34/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid beyond December 30, 2005.

  • Decision # 32/07

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should cover the cost of a Tempur-pedic mattress.

  • Decision # 31/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond February 24, 2005.

  • Decision # 30/07

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief or cost transfer.

  • Decision # 29/07

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not the worker is entitled to the payment of full wage loss benefits for the period December 30, 2005 to May 1, 2006;Issue 2: Whether or not the worker’s entitlement to full wage loss benefits effective May 2, 2006 should be contingent upon her full participation in a vocational rehabilitation program;Issue 3: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a mileage allowance to attend appointments in her local community; andIssue 4: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an Independent Living Allowance beyond May 2004.

  • Decision # 28/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 24, 2005.

  • Decision # 27/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/07

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage based on a 40 hour work week, effective October 16, 2003; andWhether or not time constraints should be placed on psychological/psychiatric interventions and medications.

  • Decision # 25/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 24/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.