Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 178/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits or services beyond May 15, 2005.

  • Decision # 177/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 176/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of working full time hours insofar as the compensable injury is concerned.

  • Decision # 175/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 12, 2003.

  • Decision # 174/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s recurrent back problems are related to the compensable injury of October 11, 2005.

  • Decision # 173/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 172/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 171/06

    Issue: October 7, 1998 claim:Whether or not a causal relationship exists between the worker’s right hip difficulties, which led to arthroplasty, and his low back injury of October 7, 1998.February 28, 2000 claim:Whether or not the worker had recovered from the effects of the February 20, 2000 injury by June 5, 2001;Whether or not wage loss benefits should have been suspended as of March 7, 2003; andWhether or not further Preventive Vocational Rehabilitation Services should be offered.

  • Decision # 170/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond November 8, 2004.

  • Decision # 169/06

    Issue: Issue 1: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for ambulance costs incurred on September 12, 2002;Issue 2: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an attendant’s allowance prior to October 1, 2000; andIssue 3: Whether or not the attendant’s allowance should remain at 45 minutes daily.

  • Decision # 168/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective September 1, 1988.

  • Decision # 167/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker had recovered from the effects of his compensable injury; andWhether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 166/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment award is correctly rated at 12%.

  • Decision # 165/06

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 164/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 163/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 9, 2005;Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the May 24, 2005 back surgery; andWhether or not the worker’s degenerative back conditions are related to his four lower back claims or to his occupation in general.

  • Decision # 162/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right knee complaints are related to the October 25, 1999 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 161/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond June 24, 2004.

  • Decision # 160/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 21, 2005.

  • Decision # 159/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 9, 2005.

  • Decision # 158/06

    Issue: Issue #1:Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits and services beyond February 11, 2005; andIssue #2:Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for tutorial services in the amount of $720.00.

  • Decision # 157/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 25, 2005; andWhether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 156/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 12, 2003.

  • Decision # 155/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond January 27, 2004.

  • Decision # 154/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was capable of performing work inspecting landscape projects as of March 3, 2003.