Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 52/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for time losses between February 17, 1996 and December 31, 1998.
-
Decision # 51/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for tinnitus or for hearing loss.
-
Decision # 50/06
Issue: Whether or not there is entitlement to wage loss benefits beyond February 6, 2005.
-
Decision # 49/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 19, 2002.
-
Decision # 48/06
Issue: Employer's Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable. Worker's Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from October 14, 2004 to January 3, 2005 and beyond January 6, 2005.
-
Decision # 47/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 46/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an independent living allowance.
-
Decision # 45/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 21, 2001.
-
Decision # 44/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the January 7, 2003 compensable injury.
-
Decision # 43/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 29, 2004.
-
Decision # 42/06
Issue: Whether or not an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification (hereafter "NOC") 7412 is appropriate; and Whether or not the deemed post-accident earning capacity of $525.00 per week is appropriate.
-
Decision # 41/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 40/06
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the conditions of left carpal tunnel syndrome and left ulnar neuropathy as being related to the compensable left shoulder injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss beyond July 25, 2004.
-
Decision # 39/06
Issue: Whether or not there is a relationship between the injury of September 2003 and the worker's current symptoms.
-
Decision # 38/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim for injuries sustained on May 30, 2003 is acceptable; and Whether or not the claim for injuries sustained on November 23, 2000 is acceptable.
-
Decision # 37/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 36/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 35/06
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 34/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional vocational rehabilitation services.
-
Decision # 33/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits after September 10, 2000.
-
Decision # 32/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the September 1, 2004 compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond February 25, 2005.
-
Decision # 31/06
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right elbow/arm/hand symptoms as being related to the August 1, 2001 compensable accident; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 15, 2004.
-
Decision # 30/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between May 24, 2003 and September 2, 2003; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2005.
-
Decision # 29/06
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 26, 2005.
-
Decision # 28/06
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's right wrist problems as a consequence of the left wrist/forearm injury of May 1, 2001.