Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 04/07

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 8, 2005.

  • Decision # 03/07

    Issue: Whether or not the victim’s claim under The Criminal Injuries Compensation Act is subject to a financial cap in relation to the provision of psychological counselling services.

  • Decision # 02/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/07

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 24, 2006.

  • Decision # 01/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 204/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee problem beyond January 13, 2004; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the September 1, 2005 right knee surgery.

  • Decision # 203/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 202/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 201/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to the cellulitis condition.

  • Decision # 200/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the left knee surgery.

  • Decision # 199/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s current low back and neck difficulties are causally related to the bilateral shoulder injury of November 28, 1988.

  • Decision # 198/06

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage effective June 13, 2005.

  • Decision # 197/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 196/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 25, 2006.

  • Decision # 195/06

    Issue: Whether or not the employer should pay the WCB a late filing penalty of $533.70.

  • Decision # 194/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for this claim beyond December 28, 2004.

  • Decision # 193/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 192/06

    Issue: Whether or not the firm’s rate of assessment should be recalculated retroactively using actual earnings confirmed by a WCB audit.

  • Decision # 191/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 190/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s mental health problems, diagnosed as Panic Disorder and depressive features, are related to the compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to costs associated with psychotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 189/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 188/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond July 22, 2003.

  • Decision # 187/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the further injury sustained to the worker’s right knee on March 15, 2005.