Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 07/05

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan of retraining the worker as a ward clerk was appropriate.

  • Decision # 06/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility can be accepted for the worker's current right hip difficulties; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 05/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's prescribed medication as being required in relation to the July 17, 2001 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 04/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 04/05

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel (MRP) should be convened.

  • Decision # 03/05

    Issue: Whether or not the current shoulder symptoms are related to the compensable accident of December 1996; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the right shoulder surgery performed on June 25, 2003; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 7, 2002.

  • Decision # 03/05

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.

  • Decision # 02/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 22, 2002.

  • Decision # 02/05

    Issue: Whether or not the time frame for filing the appeal should be extended pursuant to the provisions of subsection 60(2) of The Victims' Bill of Rights; and Whether or not the application for compensable is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 11, 2002; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 01/05

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 173/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's deemed post accident earning capacity should be $346.00 per week as of November 8, 2002.

  • Decision # 172/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits beyond February 6, 2002.

  • Decision # 171/04

    Issue: Whether or not the Appellant is entitled to receive additional death benefits over and above the lump sum payments of $5,880.00 and $32,340.00; Whether or not the WCB should reimburse costs associated with medical testing conducted in the United States; and Whether or not the WCB should reimburse travel costs associated with the claimant's property in Arizona.

  • Decision # 170/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is unemployable; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of further wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 169/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to temporary total disability benefits beyond June 1, 2002; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits and services beyond June 2, 2002.

  • Decision # 168/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 3, 2004.

  • Decision # 167/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the December 19, 2000 left knee injury; and Whether or not the left knee injury occurring August 4, 2002 is related to the December 19, 2000 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 166/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to preventive vocational rehabilitation services beyond January 15, 2002.

  • Decision # 165/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 30, 2004.

  • Decision # 164/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was entitled to wage loss benefits from October 28 to November 7, 2003.

  • Decision # 163/04

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment of 4.5% has been correctly established; and Whether or not the monetary award of the impairment rating in the amount of $570.00 has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 162/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's continuing symptoms and restrictions are as a result of the November 20, 1998 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 161/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's low back and psychological symptoms arising in November 2002 are related to the compensable injury of November 24, 1999.

  • Decision # 160/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should be based on the wages of an "A" gasfitter; and Whether or not the worker should be supported in a self-employment venture.