Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 23/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an Independent Living Allowance beyond October 2004.

  • Decision # 22/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's fall at home was a secondary accident related to the compensable injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits for the period September 23, 2004 to December 19, 2004.

  • Decision # 20/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 4, 2005.

  • Decision # 19/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment in relation to the September 19, 2001 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 18/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for time loss from work commencing September 13, 1999.

  • Decision # 17/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left hip and low back condition is related to the compensable injury of April 5, 2000.

  • Decision # 16/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 20, 2000; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for physiotherapy treatment beyond September 2000; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the March 2002 purchase of a Saunders Sacroiliac Belt; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the out of province medical treatment.

  • Decision # 15/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility for wage loss benefits and medical treatment should be extended beyond August 30, 2004.

  • Decision # 13/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 12/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cervical radiculopathy.

  • Decision # 11/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed wrist surgery.

  • Decision # 10/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was capable of performing her pre-accident duties as of August 2, 2002.

  • Decision # 09/06

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond July 10, 2001.

  • Decision # 08/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the knee surgery and subsequent time loss from work.

  • Decision # 06/06

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 06/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 05/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 05/06

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 04/06

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current back complaints or for the proposed surgery to her back.

  • Decision # 04/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is eligible for compensation.

  • Decision # 03/06

    Issue: Whether or not the victim's wage loss benefit was properly calculated for the period November 2001 to June 2003.

  • Decision # 03/06

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.