Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 178/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was offered suitable alternate duty work; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits during his absence from work.

  • Decision # 177/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker owes the WCB $2015.25.

  • Decision # 176/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period November 15 to 19, 2004.

  • Decision # 175/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 174/05

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 173/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for a left hearing aid.

  • Decision # 172/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 16, 2001.

  • Decision # 171/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full reimbursement of his expenses to job search.

  • Decision # 170/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 169/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 22, 2005.

  • Decision # 168/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of returning to his pre-accident duties; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 26, 2004.

  • Decision # 167/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's low back complaints are related to the December 3, 2002 compensable accident; Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's diagnosed major depression with anxiety, associated treatment and time loss; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond March 17, 2004.

  • Decision # 166/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 165/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 164/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 163/05

    Issue: Whether or not the left ankle and right hip problems are related to the compensable injury of June 7, 1994; and Whether or not a Medical Review Panel must be convened under subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 162/05

    Issue: Whether or not the condition of carpal tunnel syndrome is related to the 1999 workplace injury and/or to the more recent employment duties.

  • Decision # 161/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's 1% Permanent Partial Disability Award, is, and remains, accurate.

  • Decision # 160/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits to November 20, 2004.

  • Decision # 159/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should have been required to return to work in a modified duty capacity effective January 27, 2004.

  • Decision # 158/05

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left knee complaints as being related to the compensable injury of March 1, 2004; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits as a result of the left knee condition.

  • Decision # 157/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 156/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right knee condition is related to his right foot injury of August 30, 2004.

  • Decision # 155/05

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further compensation benefits.

  • Decision # 154/05

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.