Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 85/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 84/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 83/04

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment has been correctly rated.

  • Decision # 82/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 81/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 4, 2002; and Whether or not the worker's erectile dysfunction is causally related to his workplace accident.

  • Decision # 80/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 19, 2000.

  • Decision # 79/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 28, 2002.

  • Decision # 78/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s time loss from work commencing November 15, 2002.

  • Decision # 77/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 76/04

    Issue: Whether or not the plaintiff's right of action is removed pursuant to the provisions of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 75/04

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for wage loss benefits beyond January 1, 2000; and Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the surgery of September 14, 2000.

  • Decision # 74/04

    Issue: Whether or not the effective date of the worker's permanent partial impairment award has been correctly established.

  • Decision # 73/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 72/04

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the claimant's permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated; 2. Whether or not the claimant's permanent partial impairment rating should have been reduced by 50%; 3. Whether or not the financial award for the permanent partial impairment has been correctly established; 4. Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further wage loss benefits after May 10, 2001.

  • Decision # 71/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is overpaid wage loss benefits from July 21, 2003 to August 6, 2003 in the amount of $1,684.23; and Whether or not the overpayment of benefits must be repaid.

  • Decision # 70/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 15, 2001.

  • Decision # 69/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is eligible for a Permanent Partial Impairment award as a result of a July 21, 1984 right eye injury; and Whether or not the claimant has work restrictions related to his compensable eye injury that would prevent him from performing his pre-accident employment.

  • Decision # 68/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 30, 2003.

  • Decision # 67/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 11, 2002.

  • Decision # 66/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief on the basis of a pre-existing condition affecting the duration of the claim.

  • Decision # 65/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant was disabled beyond December 13, 1998 as a result of the December 10, 1998 compensable injury; and Whether or not the claimant is entitled to a Permanent Partial Impairment award in relation to the injuries sustained by reason of the compensable accident.

  • Decision # 64/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits effective August 22, 2003.

  • Decision # 63/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act; and Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 62/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's neck difficulties are related to her compensable injury of January 7, 2003.

  • Decision # 61/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's ongoing back problems are related to any of his prior compensable back injuries.