Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 60/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 59/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to compensation benefits after August 12, 1999.

  • Decision # 57/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to further vocational rehabilitation services; and Whether or not the claimant's deemed post accident earning capacity should be $389.00 per week effective July 1, 2002.

  • Decision # 56/04

    Issue: Whether or not individuals contracted to build the Director's cottage should be considered workers of the firm.

  • Decision # 55/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 54/04

    Issue: Whether or not a compensable loss of earning capacity exists beyond August 8, 2003.

  • Decision # 53/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 52/04

    Issue: Whether or not the labour portion of the cost of renovating the claimant's residence should be paid by the WCB.

  • Decision # 51/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 50/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the duration of benefits paid to the claimant from May 28, 2002 to July 27, 2002 is appropriate.

  • Decision # 49/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 48/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 7, 2002.

  • Decision # 47/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's psychological/psychiatric conditions, including PTSD are considered a result of his employment.

  • Decision # 46/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits after May 28, 2003.

  • Decision # 44/04

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 11, 2001.

  • Decision # 43/04

    Issue: Whether or not a compensable loss of earning capacity existed between March 12, 2003 and June 16, 2003 entitling the claimant to payment of wage loss benefits for this period.

  • Decision # 42/04

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act.

  • Decision # 41/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 24, 2003.

  • Decision # 40/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 39/04

    Issue: Whether or not a deemed post accident earning capacity of $628.22 per week should have been implemented effective February 1, 2003.

  • Decision # 38/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to the payment of wage loss benefits beyond November 30, 2001.

  • Decision # 37/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/04

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond April 3, 1998; and Whether or not the claimant has a collectable overpayment of benefits.