Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 47/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of benefits issued from August 4 to August 20, 2006.

  • Decision # 46/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s deemed post accident earning capacity should be $7.00 per hour for a 40 hour week.

  • Decision # 44/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right rotator cuff tear is related to the compensable injury of December 5, 2000.

  • Decision # 43/08

    Issue: Whether or not a causal relationship exists between the worker’s left wrist osteoarthritis and a fall at work and/or the general nature of the employment duties.

  • Decision # 42/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/08

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with an occupational goal of working within NOC 6661 (Light Duty Cleaning) was appropriate; Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 17, 2003; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits during the period of recovery from her left carpal tunnel syndrome surgery.

  • Decision # 40/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 12, 2005.

  • Decision # 39/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s wage loss benefits should have been suspended after June 27, 2005; andWhether or not a deemed post accident earning capacity of $304.00 per week should have been implemented effective January 9, 2007.

  • Decision # 37/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond May 15, 2005; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond August 15, 2006.

  • Decision # 36/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award in recognition of his noise induced hearing loss.

  • Decision # 35/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 34/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further treatment and wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 33/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s Permanent Partial Disability award has been correctly established at 3%.

  • Decision # 32/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 31/08

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 30/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond April 25, 2007.

  • Decision # 29/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/08

    Issue: Whether or not the effective date for the worker’s permanent partial disability award is correct.

  • Decision # 27/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/08

    Issue: 1995 Claim Relating to the Worker’s Right Knee Injury Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment award for his right knee was rated and assessed correctly. 1988 Claim Relating to the Worker’s Left Foot Injury Whether or not the worker was disabled between 1988 and 2006 as a result of the left foot injury; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for his left foot.

  • Decision # 25/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 8, 2006; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s psychological problems including associated costs.

  • Decision # 24/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker continued to experience a loss of earning capacity due to his workplace injury after his return to work on June 18, 2007.

  • Decision # 23/08

    Issue: Claim for injury occurring November 13, 2003Whether or not the worker is entitled to retroactive wage loss benefits from June 2005 in relation to the November 13, 2003 injury.Claim for injury occurring October 13, 2006Whether or not the claim is acceptable.