Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 22/08
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee difficulties as being a consequence of the compensable left knee injury.
-
Decision # 21/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond February 28, 2007.
-
Decision # 20/08
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 19/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the full day on July 4, 2007.
-
Decision # 18/08
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 17/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s Permanent Partial Impairment rating of .5% is correct.
-
Decision # 16/08
Issue: Whether or not a deemed post accident earning capacity of $842.17 per week should have been implemented effective March 25, 2007.
-
Decision # 15/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to the April 2, 2006 compensable injury for periods beyond December 3, 2006.
-
Decision # 14/08
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 13/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s left knee problems are related to the January 20, 2005 compensable injury.
-
Decision # 12/08
Issue: Whether or not the employer should be assessed a late reporting penalty of $225.00.
-
Decision # 11/08
Issue: Whether or not the effective date of August 17, 2005 for the 2% permanent partial disability award for left knee instability is correct.
-
Decision # 10/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond July 21, 2006.
-
Decision # 09/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 18, 2006.
-
Decision # 08/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s wage loss benefits have been correctly calculated.
-
Decision # 08/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in the cosmetic impairment rating.
-
Decision # 07/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond July 6, 2007.
-
Decision # 06/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s entitlement to full wage loss benefits should be reinstated; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s radial tunnel condition.
-
Decision # 05/08
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 04/08
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s back complaints are related to the September 1974 compensable injury; andWhether or not it was appropriate to implement the worker’s deemed post accident earning capacity of minimum wage for a 40 hour week effective September 25, 2003.
-
Decision # 03/08
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 02/08
Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.
-
Decision # 02/08
Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.
-
Decision # 01/08
Issue: Employer’s Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 3, 2003.Worker’s Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a period of job search and associated benefits beyond February 20, 2007.
-
Decision # 01/08
Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to an increase in the $.26 per kilometer rate currently being paid to him.