Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 115/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right of action is removed pursuant to Section 68(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 114/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 113/07

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is required to pay the reduced late filing penalty of $443.75.

  • Decision # 112/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s 1% Permanent Partial Disability Award, is, and remains, accurate.

  • Decision # 111/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 110/07

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent restrictions are appropriate; andWhether or not the occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification 7452, Materials Handler, is appropriate.

  • Decision # 109/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s pre-accident wages have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 108/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 107/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment award of $2,060.00 based on an impairment rating of 2% is correct.

  • Decision # 106/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits beyond February 28, 1985 due to the compensable psychological condition.

  • Decision # 105/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 104/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 21, 2005.

  • Decision # 103/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his PPD award.

  • Decision # 102/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s bilateral rotator cuff tears are related to the compensable injuries of May 13, 2003, October 27, 1994 and/or January 31, 1989.

  • Decision # 101/07

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act; and,Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 7, 2005.

  • Decision # 100/07

    Issue: Whether or not the 1% Permanent Partial Impairment award and the corresponding $640.00 lump sum settlement have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 99/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the injuries sustained by the worker in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on January 24, 2007.

  • Decision # 97/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 96/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 5, 2006.

  • Decision # 95/07

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the cost of reinstalling a jetted tub and fireplace.

  • Decision # 94/07

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 93/07

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of The Workers Compensation Act ("the Act").

  • Decision # 92/07

    Issue: Whether or not the firm’s activities are correctly classified under industry sub-group 310-03 “Metal Working Plant”.

  • Decision # 91/07

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from July 17, 2006 to August 22, 2006.