Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 125/10

    Issue: 2006 claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award in relation to his compensable injury of May 1, 2006; and2008 claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award in relation to his compensable injury of April 9, 2008.

  • Decision # 124/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond August 30, 2002.

  • Decision # 123/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after August 26, 2007.

  • Decision # 122/10

    Issue: Whether or not the custodial duties were within the worker's compensation restrictions; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective August 17, 2009.

  • Decision # 121/10

    Issue: Whether or not all claim costs should remain charged to the accident employer; andWhether or not the worker's relocation should have affected his entitlement to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 120/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 119/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 118/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 117/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 15, 2008; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits in her new position.

  • Decision # 116/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 115/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 114/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 5, 2009.

  • Decision # 113/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's arm difficulties in April 2008 are related to the November 29, 2007 compensable accident; andWhether or not the worker's arm difficulties beyond March 11, 2009 are related to the November 29, 2007 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 112/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for right carpal tunnel syndrome is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 16, 2009.

  • Decision # 111/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 110/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 109/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits to September 21, 2009 inclusive.

  • Decision # 108/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 107/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 105/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should have been reduced effective October 26, 2009 based on an earning capacity of full-time employment at the provincial minimum wage.

  • Decision # 104/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 103/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond April 1, 2009.

  • Decision # 102/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s back complaints are related to the April 23, 2008 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 101/10

    Issue: Whether or not there is an acceptable claim against [Employer A] and/or [Employer B]; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits due to a workplace accident with [Employer A].