Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 58/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 57/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s low back complaints are related to the 1982 compensable accident; andWhether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 56/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is required to report assessable payroll and pay premiums to the WCB retroactive to January 1, 2009.

  • Decision # 55/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial disability rating has been properly determined.

  • Decision # 54/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s net average earnings for the period July 23, 2007 to April 30, 2009 have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 53/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 52/10

    Issue: Whether or not the injured worker should be considered an independent contractor or an employee of the employer.

  • Decision # 51/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 50/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his permanent partial disability award for deterioration in his hearing loss condition.

  • Decision # 49/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond February 9, 2007; andWhether or not the overpayment of benefits in the amount of $3,707.70 should be repaid.

  • Decision # 48/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing May 14, 2009.

  • Decision # 47/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing March 13, 2009.

  • Decision # 46/10

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits after June 2, 2008.

  • Decision # 42/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/10

    Issue: Whether or not the firm’s compulsory activities should be classified under industry code 701-05 “Resorts & Lodges” or under industry code 901-05 “Camps, Recreation”; andWhether or not the employer is required to report retroactive workers’ earnings and pay premiums as assigned.

  • Decision # 40/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 39/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits at this time.

  • Decision # 37/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker was entitled to wage loss benefits until August 8, 2008.

  • Decision # 35/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 34/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.