Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 21/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from June 9, 2008 to December 11, 2008.

  • Decision # 20/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 19/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 18/10

    Issue: Whether or not the psychiatrist’s fee for services should be covered;Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement of medical aid expenses associated with treatment of his physical condition as a sequela of his compensable psychological condition; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to travel expenses for appointments prior to July 3, 1985.

  • Decision # 17/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be provided with a massage therapy bathtub; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for ongoing massage therapy.

  • Decision # 16/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits from December 20, 2008 to December 24, 2008.

  • Decision # 15/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s current back, neck, left leg and gastrointestinal complaints are related to the September 1992 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 14/10

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond May 16, 2008.

  • Decision # 13/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s psychological difficulties are related to the compensable injury.

  • Decision # 12/10

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s left knee difficulties as a sequelae of the right knee injury.

  • Decision # 11/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s net average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 10/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 28, 2007.

  • Decision # 08/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 06/10

    Issue: Claim for Injury dated December 13, 2004:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after January 26, 2006.Claim for Injury dated May 24, 2006:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after September 5, 2007.

  • Decision # 05/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 04/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 7, 2009.

  • Decision # 03/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/10

    Issue: Whether or not the time for appealing the decision refusing compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 4, 2006; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after August 13, 2006.

  • Decision # 02/10

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/10

    Issue: Whether or not the application for compensation is acceptable.

  • Decision # 126/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.