Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 46/09
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right epicondylitis, its associated treatment and time loss from work.
-
Decision # 45/09
Issue: Whether nor not the worker’s average earnings should be $418.86 per week.
-
Decision # 44/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s low back difficulties are related to the August 22, 1989 compensable injury.
-
Decision # 44/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s low back difficulties are related to the August 22, 1989 compensable injury.
-
Decision # 43/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 42/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.
-
Decision # 41/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 40/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 39/09
Issue: Whether or not “off” reserve work performed by medical drivers requires mandatory WCB coverage.
-
Decision # 38/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 37/09
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee injury and associated costs.
-
Decision # 36/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 35/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for recurrent time loss from work commencing March 23, 2001.
-
Decision # 34/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 33/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 32/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s left knee complaints are related to the July 31, 2007, compensable injury.
-
Decision # 31/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond January 2, 2008.
-
Decision # 30/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 29/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s ongoing complaints are related to the February 11, 2005 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 1, 2008.
-
Decision # 28/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right shoulder difficulties should be accepted as a compensable condition in relation to the 1996 compensable injury and/or to the general nature of the worker’s duties subsequent to 1996;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 14, 2001; andWhether or not the worker should be reimbursed for costs associated with retraining.
-
Decision # 27/09
Issue: Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for the worker’s total right knee replacement.
-
Decision # 26/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 25/09
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 24/09
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.
-
Decision # 23/09
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of home exercise equipment.