Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 114/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker failed to mitigate the consequences of his compensable injury.

  • Decision # 112/08

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act; andWhether or not the worker’s back problems which precluded her working in the summer of 2006 and since December 2006 are a sequela of her August 2005 accident.

  • Decision # 111/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and services beyond July 19, 2002.

  • Decision # 110/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 11, 2002.

  • Decision # 109/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings should be $832.54 per week from March 14, 2007 to May 15, 2007 and $881.49 per week effective May 16, 2007.

  • Decision # 108/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 107/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has a psychological injury related to the workplace incident of May 26, 2006; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 27, 2007.

  • Decision # 106/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 105/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits from March 13, 2007; andWhether or not the worker requires a restriction of no repetitive work with the right arm at any level.

  • Decision # 104/08

    Issue: Whether or not there is entitlement to repair or replacement of a laptop computer.

  • Decision # 103/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond May 19, 2004.

  • Decision # 102/08

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act to consider matters relating to chronic pain syndrome and the worker’s Permanent Partial Impairment;Whether or not the worker’s Permanent Partial Impairment has been correctly calculated to be 13%;Whether or not the worker’s Permanent Partial Impairment, not including the 1% rating for scarring, should be subject to a 50% reduction on the basis of a major pre-existing condition;Whether or not the worker’s Canada Pension Plan disability benefit should be considered a collateral benefit and reduced from his WCB wage loss benefit;Whether or not the worker’s restrictions are appropriate; Whether or not the worker is capable of participating in vocational rehabilitation; andWhether or not it was appropriate for the WCB to find that the worker failed to mitigate his claim by not participating in vocational rehabilitation and therefore deem him capable of earning $320.00 per week.

  • Decision # 101/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 25, 2003.

  • Decision # 100/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to special additional compensation benefits beyond March 2008.

  • Decision # 99/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between August 2004 and November 16, 2004.

  • Decision # 98/08

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 97/08

    Issue: Whether a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 96/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 95/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 94/08

    Issue: Whether or not the estate is entitled to an increase in the 5% permanent partial disability award; andWhether or not there is entitlement to a cosmetic disfigurement award in respect to the July 13, 1979 low back injury.

  • Decision # 93/08

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 29, 1994.

  • Decision # 92/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/08

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 90/08

    Issue: Whether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $320.00 per week should have been implemented as of October 8, 2007.