Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 42/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 41/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 40/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 39/09

    Issue: Whether or not “off” reserve work performed by medical drivers requires mandatory WCB coverage.

  • Decision # 38/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 37/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s right knee injury and associated costs.

  • Decision # 36/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 35/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for recurrent time loss from work commencing March 23, 2001.

  • Decision # 34/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 32/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s left knee complaints are related to the July 31, 2007, compensable injury.

  • Decision # 31/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond January 2, 2008.

  • Decision # 30/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s ongoing complaints are related to the February 11, 2005 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 1, 2008.

  • Decision # 28/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s right shoulder difficulties should be accepted as a compensable condition in relation to the 1996 compensable injury and/or to the general nature of the worker’s duties subsequent to 1996;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 14, 2001; andWhether or not the worker should be reimbursed for costs associated with retraining.

  • Decision # 27/09

    Issue: Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for the worker’s total right knee replacement.

  • Decision # 26/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 24/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 23/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the purchase of home exercise equipment.

  • Decision # 22/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s psychological symptoms are related to the April 4, 2006 compensable accident.

  • Decision # 21/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from June 30, 2008 to July 9, 2008.

  • Decision # 20/09

    Issue: Whether or not the injured worker should be considered an independent contractor or an employee of the employer.

  • Decision # 19/09

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with an occupational goal of working within National Occupational Classification (“NOC”) 6421 (Retail Salesperson and Salesclerk) was appropriate; andWhether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity of minimum wage should have been implemented as of November 22, 2006.

  • Decision # 18/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond May 16, 2001.