Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 46/10

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits after June 2, 2008.

  • Decision # 42/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/10

    Issue: Whether or not the firm’s compulsory activities should be classified under industry code 701-05 “Resorts & Lodges” or under industry code 901-05 “Camps, Recreation”; andWhether or not the employer is required to report retroactive workers’ earnings and pay premiums as assigned.

  • Decision # 40/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 39/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits at this time.

  • Decision # 37/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker was entitled to wage loss benefits until August 8, 2008.

  • Decision # 35/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 34/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his left ear.

  • Decision # 32/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 31/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 9, 2005.

  • Decision # 30/10

    Issue: Whether or not spousal benefits are payable.

  • Decision # 29/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 27/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits after November 23, 2007; andWhether or not the worker’s average earnings have been properly calculated.

  • Decision # 26/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s moving expenses should be covered.

  • Decision # 25/10

    Issue: Claim for accident occurring April 3, 2007:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 3, 2007; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for medical treatment beyond October 23, 2007.Claim for accident occurring March 8, 2008:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 1, 2008.

  • Decision # 24/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 6, 2008 in relation to her back and shoulder complaints.

  • Decision # 23/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 22/10

    Issue: The worker filed a claim with the Workers Compensation Board (“WCB”) for a right knee injury that occurred on June 26, 2008 during the course of her employment as a nurse’s aide. The claim for compensation was accepted and benefits were paid to the worker up to April 1, 2009 when it was determined that the worker had recovered from the effects of her compensable injury and that her current knee complaints were attributable to advanced osteoarthritis. The worker disagreed with the decision and an appeal was filed with the Appeal Commission. A hearing was held on December 10, 2009 to consider the matter.