Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 71/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 70/09

    Issue: Whether or not a relationship exists between the worker’s right shoulder/arm pain and the compensable injury of February 14, 2004.

  • Decision # 69/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits prior to the date of his left knee surgery.

  • Decision # 68/09

    Issue: Whether or not the firm should be assessed 50% of the costs associated with a compensable accident sustained by a worker of another firm on August 10, 2007.

  • Decision # 67/09

    Issue: Whether or not further physiotherapy treatment should be authorized.

  • Decision # 66/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed traveling expenses to attend a doctor in Saskatoon.

  • Decision # 65/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 64/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 63/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s left ankle condition; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a personal care attendant’s allowance above three hours a day for four weeks followed by two hours a day for four weeks.

  • Decision # 62/09

    Issue: (1) Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 8, 2007; and(2) Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the surgery performed on January 3, 2008.

  • Decision # 61/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 60/09

    Issue: Whether or not the employer met its obligations to re-employ the worker pursuant to Section 49.3 of the Act; andWhether or not the worker is eligible for consideration of preventive vocational rehabilitation benefits and services.

  • Decision # 59/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 58/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current back difficulties.

  • Decision # 57/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s acupuncture treatment should be covered.

  • Decision # 56/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 18, 2008.

  • Decision # 55/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits between January 18, 2007 and October 14, 2007;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 1, 2008; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s left shoulder complaints.

  • Decision # 54/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s low back complaints in relation to the November 24, 2005 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 53/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits beyond January 29, 1993.

  • Decision # 52/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current right shoulder difficulties in relation to the July 24, 2003 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 51/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s ongoing right knee problems are related to the compensable injury of July 15, 2007.

  • Decision # 50/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 49/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 6, 2007.

  • Decision # 48/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after April 7, 2008; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs associated with the physical reconditioning program.

  • Decision # 47/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.