Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 116/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and medical treatment after May 2, 2007.

  • Decision # 115/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s left shoulder problems are related to the compensable right shoulder injury; andWhether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate.

  • Decision # 114/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 12, 2008.

  • Decision # 113/09

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits retroactive to May 15, 2006.

  • Decision # 112/09

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits and physiotherapy treatment should be authorized beyond January 13, 2009; andWhether or not the worker’s low back complaints are related to the compensable knee injury of October 14, 2006.

  • Decision # 111/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after December 21, 2008.

  • Decision # 110/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the May 15, 2008 surgery; andWhether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 109/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits beyond December 18, 2008.

  • Decision # 108/09

    Issue: February 25, 1970 claimWhether or not the effective date for the worker’s permanent partial disability award has been correctly established as being June 15, 2005.October 3, 1985 claimWhether or not the worker’s osteoarthritic condition is related to the October 3, 1985 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability and medical aid benefits in relation to the October 3, 1985 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award for cosmetic disfigurement of the left leg/knee.November 21, 1985 claimWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award in relation to the November 21, 1985 right thumb injury.September 6, 1989 claimWhether or not the worker’s sexual dysfunction is related to the September 6, 1989 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits for the period May 14, 1990 to November 12, 1995.October 31, 1989 claimWhether or not the worker’s sexual dysfunction is related to the October 31, 1989 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits for the period May 14, 1990 to November 12, 1995;Whether or not the worker’s cardiac permanent partial disability award should be reduced from 29% to 14.5% andWhether or not 25% of the worker’s Canada Pension Plan disability benefits should be considered an injury related benefit.

  • Decision # 107/09

    Issue: Whether or not the employer should be allowed to recover the overpayment from the worker; andWhether or not the overpayment should remain as a claims cost on the employer’s claims experience.

  • Decision # 106/09

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s current low back difficulties.

  • Decision # 105/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of earning $382.00 per week effective August 30, 2008.

  • Decision # 104/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits.

  • Decision # 103/09

    Issue: Whether or not the employer’s business activities meet the requirements for compulsory coverage under the Act.

  • Decision # 102/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s current left ankle symptoms have a relationship to the right ankle claim of March 22, 1986.

  • Decision # 101/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to Special Additional Compensation benefits after November 30, 2008.

  • Decision # 100/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 8, 2007.

  • Decision # 99/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits beyond July 18, 2008.

  • Decision # 97/09

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 27, 2008.

  • Decision # 96/09

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 95/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the physical effects of his accident; andWhether or not medications should be covered beyond January 26, 2009.

  • Decision # 94/09

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond May 30, 2008.

  • Decision # 93/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 92/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.