Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 50/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an increase in his permanent partial disability award for deterioration in his hearing loss condition.

  • Decision # 49/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond February 9, 2007; andWhether or not the overpayment of benefits in the amount of $3,707.70 should be repaid.

  • Decision # 48/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing May 14, 2009.

  • Decision # 47/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits commencing March 13, 2009.

  • Decision # 46/10

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 45/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 43/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits after June 2, 2008.

  • Decision # 42/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 41/10

    Issue: Whether or not the firm’s compulsory activities should be classified under industry code 701-05 “Resorts & Lodges” or under industry code 901-05 “Camps, Recreation”; andWhether or not the employer is required to report retroactive workers’ earnings and pay premiums as assigned.

  • Decision # 40/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 39/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 38/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional benefits at this time.

  • Decision # 37/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker was entitled to wage loss benefits until August 8, 2008.

  • Decision # 35/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 34/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 33/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a hearing aid for his left ear.

  • Decision # 32/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 31/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 9, 2005.

  • Decision # 30/10

    Issue: Whether or not spousal benefits are payable.

  • Decision # 29/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 27/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits after November 23, 2007; andWhether or not the worker’s average earnings have been properly calculated.

  • Decision # 26/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s moving expenses should be covered.