Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 96/09

    Issue: Whether the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 95/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the physical effects of his accident; andWhether or not medications should be covered beyond January 26, 2009.

  • Decision # 94/09

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond May 30, 2008.

  • Decision # 93/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 92/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/09

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond June 6, 2008.

  • Decision # 90/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 89/09

    Issue: Employer Appeal – 2006 Claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from June 17, 2006, to July 6, 2006.Worker Appeal – 2007 Claim:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 88/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 24, 2006; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits beyond May 16, 2006.

  • Decision # 87/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 31, 2008.

  • Decision # 86/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 85/09

    Issue: 1) Whether or not the worker’s rehabilitation plan was appropriate;2) Whether or not a deemed post accident earning capacity of $320.00 per week should have been implemented effective June 21, 2003; 3) Whether or not the worker is entitled to further vocational rehabilitation assistance; and4) Whether or not the worker should be provided with further physiotherapy and/or a reconditioning program.

  • Decision # 84/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 83/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 30, 2005 in relation to his compensable injury of October 18, 2002; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 10, 2007 in relation to his compensable injury of October 18, 2002 and/or of December 11, 2006.

  • Decision # 82/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional workers compensation benefits.

  • Decision # 81/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s left elbow problems and associated surgical treatment are related to the compensable left shoulder injury and surgery.

  • Decision # 80/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 30, 2009.

  • Decision # 79/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 77/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s antidepressant medication should be covered.

  • Decision # 76/09

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 5, 2006.

  • Decision # 75/09

    Issue: Whether or not the employer must pay an administrative penalty for late reporting of a claim.

  • Decision # 74/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 72/09

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.