Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 23/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from August 24, 2009 to January 4, 2010 resulting from time loss from her concurrent employment.

  • Decision # 22/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/11

    Issue: Whether or not a medical review panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 20/11

    Issue: Whether or not the deemed post-accident earning capacity equal to provincial minimum wage was correctly implemented effective May 16, 2009.

  • Decision # 19/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 18/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 20, 2008.

  • Decision # 17/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid and wage loss benefits beyond July 24, 2009.

  • Decision # 16/11

    Issue: Whether or not the December 30, 2006 workplace accident resulted in an enhancement of the worker's pre-existing right knee osteoarthritis; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 13, 2007.

  • Decision # 15/11

    Issue: Claim for injury occurring August 5, 2008:Whether or not the worker is entitled to WCB benefits beyond July 15, 2009.Claim for injury occurring July 26, 2008:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 13/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 12/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after September 7, 2009.

  • Decision # 10/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement of his legal expenses.

  • Decision # 09/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 20, 2009.

  • Decision # 08/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 1, 2009.

  • Decision # 07/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 15, 2010.

  • Decision # 06/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits for the period April 16, 2001 to July 9, 2004 should have been reduced based on a minimum wage earning capacity; andWhether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should have been reduced effective February 8, 2005 based on a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $346.00 per week.

  • Decision # 05/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's 5% Permanent Partial Disability award remains accurate.

  • Decision # 04/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed for the costs related to attending an Occupational Health and Safety program at the University of Manitoba;Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial disability awards should be deducted from his benefits;Whether or not the worker’s Canada Pension Plan Disability benefit should be taken into account when calculating his benefit entitlement as of February 1, 1999; Whether or not the Canada Pension Plan children’s benefit paid in respect of the worker’s child should be taken into account when calculating the worker’s benefits from February 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000; Whether or not the worker is entitled to special additional compensation;Whether or not the recalculation of the worker's wage loss benefit for 1997 and 1998 created an overpayment;Whether or not there was an administrative penalty applied to the worker's claim;Whether or not the worker's current benefit rate has been correctly calculated; andWhether or not the correct amount of Canada Pension Plan disability benefits have been used in the calculation of the worker's wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 02/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current head, neck, shoulder and arm problems are related to the compensable injury of February 6, 1978.

  • Decision # 02/11

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.

  • Decision # 01/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for right carpal tunnel syndrome is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/11

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the application is acceptable.