Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 112/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for right carpal tunnel syndrome is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after July 16, 2009.

  • Decision # 111/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 110/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 109/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits to September 21, 2009 inclusive.

  • Decision # 108/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 107/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 106/10

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 105/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should have been reduced effective October 26, 2009 based on an earning capacity of full-time employment at the provincial minimum wage.

  • Decision # 104/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 103/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond April 1, 2009.

  • Decision # 102/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s back complaints are related to the April 23, 2008 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 101/10

    Issue: Whether or not there is an acceptable claim against [Employer A] and/or [Employer B]; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits due to a workplace accident with [Employer A].

  • Decision # 100/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an additional independent living allowance.

  • Decision # 99/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after June 5, 2009.

  • Decision # 98/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 97/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has been overpaid $2,233.88.

  • Decision # 96/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible to repay the overpayment on his claim.

  • Decision # 95/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 94/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing back and left leg complaints are related to the July 28, 2007 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 15, 2009.

  • Decision # 93/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 92/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is required to repay the overpayment.

  • Decision # 91/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 10, 2010.

  • Decision # 90/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to replacement of his hearing aids at this time.

  • Decision # 89/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a disability award in recognition of his hearing deficit.

  • Decision # 88/10

    Issue: Claim No. 0804 4983:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Claim No. 0804 1350:Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond February 9, 2009.