Public Decisions
To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.
- Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
- If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
- If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
- If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
- Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
- Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
-
Decision # 35/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker's right ankle injury occurring August 29, 2010 is related to the compensable injury of June 24, 2010.
-
Decision # 34/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker's left knee, right hip and lower back difficulties are related to the June 1, 2006 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker's current left ankle difficulties are related to the June 1, 2006 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits beyond October 31, 2010; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 30, 2010.
-
Decision # 33/11
Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's October 2, 2007 spinal surgery; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 7, 2008.
-
Decision # 32/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 31/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 9, 2009.
-
Decision # 30/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 29/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 28/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 27/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 26/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 25/11
Issue: Whether or not the firm is required to pay the WCB prior year assessments commencing in 2006.
-
Decision # 24/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker was capable of working 6 hour shifts on a daily basis during the period December 3, 2009 to February 3, 2010.
-
Decision # 23/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from August 24, 2009 to January 4, 2010 resulting from time loss from her concurrent employment.
-
Decision # 22/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 21/11
Issue: Whether or not a medical review panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.
-
Decision # 20/11
Issue: Whether or not the deemed post-accident earning capacity equal to provincial minimum wage was correctly implemented effective May 16, 2009.
-
Decision # 19/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.
-
Decision # 18/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 20, 2008.
-
Decision # 17/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid and wage loss benefits beyond July 24, 2009.
-
Decision # 16/11
Issue: Whether or not the December 30, 2006 workplace accident resulted in an enhancement of the worker's pre-existing right knee osteoarthritis; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 13, 2007.
-
Decision # 15/11
Issue: Claim for injury occurring August 5, 2008:Whether or not the worker is entitled to WCB benefits beyond July 15, 2009.Claim for injury occurring July 26, 2008:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 14/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 28, 2009.
-
Decision # 13/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 28, 2009.
-
Decision # 12/11
Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.
-
Decision # 11/11
Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after September 7, 2009.