Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 98/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 97/11

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 96/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's vocational rehabilitation plan was appropriate.

  • Decision # 95/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 94/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective May 1, 2007;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits as a result of her surgery on January 17, 2008; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a 2.5% permanent partial impairment rating.

  • Decision # 93/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairments awards have been properly calculated.

  • Decision # 92/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 91/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 29, 2010; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for chiropractic treatment after January 15, 2009.

  • Decision # 90/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 89/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 88/11

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the diagnosis of bilateral de Quervain's tenosynovitis as being related to the compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits and medical treatment beyond March 2, 2010.

  • Decision # 87/11

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 86/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current back difficulties are related to the October 15, 1962 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 85/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 84/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 23, 2009.

  • Decision # 83/11

    Issue: Whether or not the firm's assessment should be based on a transfer of employer cost experience.

  • Decision # 82/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 9, 2011.

  • Decision # 81/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 9, 2009.

  • Decision # 80/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable as a right inguinal hernia injury.

  • Decision # 79/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 78/11

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's left knee difficulties.

  • Decision # 77/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 76/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's neck, jaw and headache complaints are related to the June 4, 2005 compensable accident; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 11, 2005.

  • Decision # 75/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 74/11

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's healthcare treatment.