Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 60/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 11, 2008.

  • Decision # 59/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 21, 2009.

  • Decision # 58/11

    Issue: Whether or not the compensable injury of November 13, 2008 permanently enhanced the worker's pre-existing knee condition.

  • Decision # 57/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repaying the overpayment of wage loss benefits in the amount of $1356.13.

  • Decision # 56/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 26, 2009.

  • Decision # 55/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 54/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in respect of his left hip.

  • Decision # 53/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 23, 2003 in relation to the compensable injury of April 4, 2003.

  • Decision # 52/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome is acceptable.

  • Decision # 51/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 26, 2010.

  • Decision # 50/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 49/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 13, 2009.

  • Decision # 48/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's identified restrictions are appropriate.

  • Decision # 47/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 46/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits effective November 3, 2009;Whether or not the worker's right shoulder/neck condition is related to the low back injury of October 31, 2007; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 19, 2010 in relation to his compensable low back injury of October 31, 2007.

  • Decision # 45/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after March 16, 2010.

  • Decision # 44/11

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 43/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 42/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 2, 2004.

  • Decision # 41/11

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 40/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 24, 2009.

  • Decision # 39/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond February 23, 2010.

  • Decision # 38/11

    Issue: Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation plan with an occupational goal of working within NOC 1453, Customer Services, Information and Related Clerks is appropriate; andWhether or not it is appropriate to implement a deemed earning capacity based on NOC 1453 from November 11, 2008 to August 21, 2009.

  • Decision # 37/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 9, 2009.

  • Decision # 36/11

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's L1 compression fracture.