Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 10/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement of his legal expenses.

  • Decision # 09/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 20, 2009.

  • Decision # 08/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 1, 2009.

  • Decision # 07/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 15, 2010.

  • Decision # 06/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits for the period April 16, 2001 to July 9, 2004 should have been reduced based on a minimum wage earning capacity; andWhether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should have been reduced effective February 8, 2005 based on a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $346.00 per week.

  • Decision # 05/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's 5% Permanent Partial Disability award remains accurate.

  • Decision # 04/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed for the costs related to attending an Occupational Health and Safety program at the University of Manitoba;Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial disability awards should be deducted from his benefits;Whether or not the worker’s Canada Pension Plan Disability benefit should be taken into account when calculating his benefit entitlement as of February 1, 1999; Whether or not the Canada Pension Plan children’s benefit paid in respect of the worker’s child should be taken into account when calculating the worker’s benefits from February 1, 1999 to December 31, 2000; Whether or not the worker is entitled to special additional compensation;Whether or not the recalculation of the worker's wage loss benefit for 1997 and 1998 created an overpayment;Whether or not there was an administrative penalty applied to the worker's claim;Whether or not the worker's current benefit rate has been correctly calculated; andWhether or not the correct amount of Canada Pension Plan disability benefits have been used in the calculation of the worker's wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 02/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's current head, neck, shoulder and arm problems are related to the compensable injury of February 6, 1978.

  • Decision # 02/11

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended.

  • Decision # 01/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for right carpal tunnel syndrome is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/11

    Issue: Whether or not the time for making an application for compensation should be extended; andWhether or not the application is acceptable.

  • Decision # 125/10

    Issue: 2006 claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award in relation to his compensable injury of May 1, 2006; and2008 claim:Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award in relation to his compensable injury of April 9, 2008.

  • Decision # 124/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond August 30, 2002.

  • Decision # 123/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after August 26, 2007.

  • Decision # 122/10

    Issue: Whether or not the custodial duties were within the worker's compensation restrictions; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective August 17, 2009.

  • Decision # 121/10

    Issue: Whether or not all claim costs should remain charged to the accident employer; andWhether or not the worker's relocation should have affected his entitlement to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 120/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 119/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 118/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 117/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 15, 2008; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to partial wage loss benefits in her new position.

  • Decision # 116/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 115/10

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 114/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 5, 2009.

  • Decision # 113/10

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's arm difficulties in April 2008 are related to the November 29, 2007 compensable accident; andWhether or not the worker's arm difficulties beyond March 11, 2009 are related to the November 29, 2007 compensable accident.