Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 31/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 9, 2009.

  • Decision # 30/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 27/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 25/11

    Issue: Whether or not the firm is required to pay the WCB prior year assessments commencing in 2006.

  • Decision # 24/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker was capable of working 6 hour shifts on a daily basis during the period December 3, 2009 to February 3, 2010.

  • Decision # 23/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from August 24, 2009 to January 4, 2010 resulting from time loss from her concurrent employment.

  • Decision # 22/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/11

    Issue: Whether or not a medical review panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 20/11

    Issue: Whether or not the deemed post-accident earning capacity equal to provincial minimum wage was correctly implemented effective May 16, 2009.

  • Decision # 19/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 18/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 20, 2008.

  • Decision # 17/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid and wage loss benefits beyond July 24, 2009.

  • Decision # 16/11

    Issue: Whether or not the December 30, 2006 workplace accident resulted in an enhancement of the worker's pre-existing right knee osteoarthritis; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 13, 2007.

  • Decision # 15/11

    Issue: Claim for injury occurring August 5, 2008:Whether or not the worker is entitled to WCB benefits beyond July 15, 2009.Claim for injury occurring July 26, 2008:Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 14/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 13/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 12/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 11/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after September 7, 2009.

  • Decision # 10/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement of his legal expenses.

  • Decision # 09/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 20, 2009.

  • Decision # 08/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after October 1, 2009.

  • Decision # 07/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after April 15, 2010.