Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 18/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/12

    Issue: Whether or not the firm has been properly classified.

  • Decision # 15/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 31, 2011 to June 28, 2011.

  • Decision # 14/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to her March 31, 2009 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 12/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to both payments covering wage loss benefits for the period February 11, 2011 to February 24, 2011; Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for the NSF fee; and Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 11/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 10/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for travelling expenses to attend a chiropractor in Winnipeg.

  • Decision # 09/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 11, 2008.

  • Decision # 08/12

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 07/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should be reinstated effective August 2, 2011.

  • Decision # 06/12

    Issue: Employer Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 3, 2011. Worker Appeal:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from February 19, 2011 to May 12, 2011.

  • Decision # 05/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 04/12

    Issue: Whether or not the Permanent Partial Impairment rating of 5.3% had been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 03/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits have been correctly reduced by the deemed earning capacity for NOC 6623-Other Elemental Sales effective April 30, 2011.

  • Decision # 01/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed travel expenses to attend a general practitioner in The Pas, Manitoba.

  • Decision # 180/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 179/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 178/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 8, 2009.

  • Decision # 177/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 176/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 28, 2010.

  • Decision # 175/11

    Issue: Employer Issues: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 22, 2010; andWhether or not the worker's wage loss entitlement effective June 22, 2010 was properly calculated.Worker Issues:Whether or not the modified duties offered on June 22, 2010 are appropriate; andWhether or not the worker's wage loss entitlement effective September 22, 2010 was properly calculated.

  • Decision # 174/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits beyond February 19, 2009.