Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 160/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits and services.

  • Decision # 159/11

    Issue: Accident date March 27, 2009: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Accident date August 18, 2010: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 158/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 5, 2008.

  • Decision # 157/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond November 10, 2009; Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits beyond January 12, 2010;Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's January 13, 2010 back surgery; and Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 156/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits after August 14, 2008.

  • Decision # 155/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left knee condition is related to the compensable right ankle injury; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for a power wheelchair, wheelchair lift or home modifications in relation to the left knee condition.

  • Decision # 154/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 153/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits from November 16, 2006 to January 7, 2007.

  • Decision # 152/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after May 7, 2010.

  • Decision # 151/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 2, 2011.

  • Decision # 150/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 149/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's T6 compression fracture is related to her compensable injury of November 28, 2010.

  • Decision # 148/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and/or medical aid benefits beyond July 20, 2009.

  • Decision # 147/11

    Issue: Whether or not off-reserve work performed by employees of the firm requires mandatory WCB coverage.

  • Decision # 146/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond April 6, 2010.

  • Decision # 145/11

    Issue: Whether or not the permanent partial impairment has been correctly calculated at 1.35%.

  • Decision # 144/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 143/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from September 18, 1999 to August 20, 2008; Whether or not the right shoulder surgery performed on August 21, 2008 is related to the September 11, 1998 compensable injury; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits effective August 21, 2008.

  • Decision # 142/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 141/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left thumb complaints are compensable; Whether or not the worker's Canada Pension Plan disability benefits should be taken into account when calculating his wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker's retroactive entitlement to benefits was correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 140/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 139/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of increasing his hours at work beyond four hours per day effective October 2010;Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after December 21, 2010; andWhether or not the worker's fall at home on August 11, 2010 is related to the January 29, 2006 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 138/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 137/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond March 27, 2007.

  • Decision # 136/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period June 24, 2010 to December 21, 2010 inclusive; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment award has been correctly calculated; andWhether or not the financial value of the permanent partial impairment award is correct.