Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 76/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's claim for a right shoulder injury is acceptable as a recurrence of the April 2010 compensable injury or as a new accident.

  • Decision # 75/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits and services beyond May 21, 2008.

  • Decision # 74/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 73/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond September 14, 2007.

  • Decision # 72/12

    Issue: Whether or not the occupational goal of NOC 1453 - Customer Service, Information and Related Clerks is appropriate;Whether or not a deemed earning capacity based on NOC 1453 should be implemented effective February 24, 2010; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to full wage loss benefits effective February 27, 2010.

  • Decision # 71/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 70/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's back symptoms are related to his November 21, 2010 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 69/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further wage loss benefits; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award as a result of the March 16, 2009 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 68/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 8, 2008.

  • Decision # 67/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's back condition is related to the November 26, 2006 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 66/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to additional medical aid benefits; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 65/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 64/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's right meniscus tear is related to the compensable injury of May 26, 2010.

  • Decision # 63/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to his August 6, 2011 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 62/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 61/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial disability award.

  • Decision # 60/12

    Issue: Whether or not the firm should be retroactively assessed for the period 2006 through 2010 in relation to their immobilizer installation activities.

  • Decision # 59/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's medications.

  • Decision # 58/12

    Issue: Whether or not the implementation of a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $600.00 per week effective August 27, 2011 was appropriate.

  • Decision # 57/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond June 17, 2009.

  • Decision # 56/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 24, 2011; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment award of $2,120 based on an impairment rating of 2.5% is correct.

  • Decision # 55/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be provided with footwear for use with his custom orthotics; andWhether or not the worker should be provided with a medical bed.

  • Decision # 54/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 53/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 52/12

    Issue: Whether or not the director of an associated firm should be categorized as a worker of the appellant firm and have her earnings assessed for 2008, 2009 and 2010.