Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 101/12

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $400 per week effective October 2, 2011.

  • Decision # 100/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond December 2, 2010.

  • Decision # 99/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/12

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 97/12

    Issue: 2009 Claim Whether or not the worker's foot, back and neck symptoms beyond March 14, 2010 are related to the compensable injury of June 2, 2009; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 29, 2010. All Claims Whether or not the worker's post-January 30, 2010 complaints and resultant loss of earning capacity is related to his general work duties separately or together with any or any combination of his prior compensable claims.

  • Decision # 96/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for January 5 and 6, 2012.

  • Decision # 95/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 5, 2002.

  • Decision # 94/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 93/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's retroactive wage loss benefits have been correctly calculated;Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $400.00 per week effective March 11, 2012; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to further vocational rehabilitation services including retraining.

  • Decision # 92/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 91/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits after March 2, 2012.

  • Decision # 90/12

    Issue: Whether or not it is appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $380.00 per week effective May 21, 2011.

  • Decision # 89/12

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker’s left knee complaints as having a relationship to the right knee injury of June 23, 2006; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 10, 2008.

  • Decision # 88/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 87/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss entitlement effective November 14, 2011 was properly calculated.

  • Decision # 86/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a permanent partial impairment award.

  • Decision # 85/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond April 13, 2010.

  • Decision # 84/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 2, 2012; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to financial assistance toward his school program.

  • Decision # 83/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 82/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 8, 2010.

  • Decision # 81/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to Special Additional Compensation Benefits after January 31, 2012.

  • Decision # 80/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 2, 2004.

  • Decision # 79/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after July 14, 2010.

  • Decision # 78/12

    Issue: August 26, 1996 claim Whether or not the worker's neck complaints are related to his August 26, 1996 compensable injury;Whether or not the worker's permanent restrictions should include no periodic climbing of short ladders;Whether or not the vocational rehabilitation goal of pin to pin long haul truck driver was appropriate; Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 2.3% for his left shoulder is accurate; Whether or not the worker is entitled to an additional financial award in relation to his left shoulder permanent partial impairment; andWhether or not the worker's entitlement to further wage loss benefits should be based on his actual post-accident earnings or a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $718.70 per week.February 18, 2010 claim Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 3.6% and the $3480 award for his right shoulder injury has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 77/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 10, 2011; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment award of 1.70% should be reduced 50%.