Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 118/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 117/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's left hip/thigh complaints are related to the January 24, 2012 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 116/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 115/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 10, 2011.

  • Decision # 114/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 113/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should be reduced based on a deemed earning capacity of $559.12 per week effective July 6, 2011.

  • Decision # 112/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should have been able to participate in a modified duty return to work plan effective April 2, 2008; andWhether or not the worker had a compensable loss of earning capacity as of April 2, 2008.

  • Decision # 111/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic treatment beyond March 27, 2012.

  • Decision # 110/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 109/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond October 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 108/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 107/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 106/12

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 105/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is responsible for repayment of the $5616.65 overpayment.

  • Decision # 104/12

    Issue: i. Whether or not the worker's PPI rating has been correctly calculated; and,ii. Whether or not the worker's lump sum impairment award has been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 103/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits; andWhether or not the worker's average earnings should be $365.71 weekly.

  • Decision # 102/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond November 6, 2011.

  • Decision # 101/12

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to implement a post-accident deemed earning capacity of $400 per week effective October 2, 2011.

  • Decision # 100/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond December 2, 2010.

  • Decision # 99/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 98/12

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 97/12

    Issue: 2009 Claim Whether or not the worker's foot, back and neck symptoms beyond March 14, 2010 are related to the compensable injury of June 2, 2009; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 29, 2010. All Claims Whether or not the worker's post-January 30, 2010 complaints and resultant loss of earning capacity is related to his general work duties separately or together with any or any combination of his prior compensable claims.

  • Decision # 96/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for January 5 and 6, 2012.

  • Decision # 95/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 5, 2002.

  • Decision # 94/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.