Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 05/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 04/12

    Issue: Whether or not the Permanent Partial Impairment rating of 5.3% had been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 03/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits have been correctly reduced by the deemed earning capacity for NOC 6623-Other Elemental Sales effective April 30, 2011.

  • Decision # 01/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be reimbursed travel expenses to attend a general practitioner in The Pas, Manitoba.

  • Decision # 180/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 179/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 178/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 8, 2009.

  • Decision # 177/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 176/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 28, 2010.

  • Decision # 175/11

    Issue: Employer Issues: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 22, 2010; andWhether or not the worker's wage loss entitlement effective June 22, 2010 was properly calculated.Worker Issues:Whether or not the modified duties offered on June 22, 2010 are appropriate; andWhether or not the worker's wage loss entitlement effective September 22, 2010 was properly calculated.

  • Decision # 174/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits beyond February 19, 2009.

  • Decision # 173/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after January 24, 2011.

  • Decision # 172/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 171/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after May 10, 2010.

  • Decision # 170/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 169/11

    Issue: Whether or not the employer is entitled to cost relief.

  • Decision # 168/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 27, 2007.

  • Decision # 167/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to an extension of the Independent Living Allowance; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for painting the interior of the worker's home.

  • Decision # 166/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 165/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's cervical/arm symptoms commencing July 6, 2009 are related to the December 27, 2003 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 164/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits beyond March 31, 2011.

  • Decision # 163/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 162/11

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 161/11

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's pre-accident gross weekly wages should be adjusted.