Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 60/12

    Issue: Whether or not the firm should be retroactively assessed for the period 2006 through 2010 in relation to their immobilizer installation activities.

  • Decision # 59/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's medications.

  • Decision # 58/12

    Issue: Whether or not the implementation of a deemed post-accident earning capacity of $600.00 per week effective August 27, 2011 was appropriate.

  • Decision # 57/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits beyond June 17, 2009.

  • Decision # 56/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after January 24, 2011; andWhether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment award of $2,120 based on an impairment rating of 2.5% is correct.

  • Decision # 55/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker should be provided with footwear for use with his custom orthotics; andWhether or not the worker should be provided with a medical bed.

  • Decision # 54/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 53/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment.

  • Decision # 52/12

    Issue: Whether or not the director of an associated firm should be categorized as a worker of the appellant firm and have her earnings assessed for 2008, 2009 and 2010.

  • Decision # 51/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's average earnings should be adjusted based on the tax assessment for the year 2000.

  • Decision # 50/12

    Issue: Whether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity of Provincial Minimum Wage should be implemented effective December 1, 2007.

  • Decision # 49/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is capable of working full time.

  • Decision # 48/12

    Issue: Whether or not it was appropriate to suspend the worker's wage loss benefits as of August 7, 2007; andWhether or not the worker should be provided with further medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 47/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 46/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 12, 2011.

  • Decision # 45/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from August 29, 2011 to October 7, 2011.

  • Decision # 43/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 42/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to hearing aids.

  • Decision # 41/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits and services beyond February 3, 2010.

  • Decision # 40/12

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the July 8, 2011 left shoulder surgery.

  • Decision # 39/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss or medical aid benefits after July 25, 2011.

  • Decision # 38/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to temporary total disability benefits between August 25, 1966 and May 2, 1978.

  • Decision # 37/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 36/12

    Issue: Whether or not a deemed post-accident earning capacity equivalent to 40 hours per week at provincial minimum wage should be implemented effective December 15, 2009.