Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 30/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 28, 2004; andWhether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits and services.

  • Decision # 29/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 28/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 27/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's permanent partial impairment rating of 10.54% has been correctly established.

  • Decision # 26/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after June 18, 2008; andWhether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's May 10, 2010 partial medial meniscectomy.

  • Decision # 25/12

    Issue: Whether or not the employer should be charged for medical reports relating to a claim for injuries not sustained in a workplace accident.

  • Decision # 24/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to compensation benefits for an ACL tear relating to the work-place accident on October 28, 2009.

  • Decision # 23/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 9, 2009.

  • Decision # 22/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 21/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 20/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits and services beyond April 20, 2001.

  • Decision # 19/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period August 29, 2009 to January 20, 2010.

  • Decision # 18/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 16/12

    Issue: Whether or not the firm has been properly classified.

  • Decision # 15/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from May 31, 2011 to June 28, 2011.

  • Decision # 14/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 13/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits in relation to her March 31, 2009 compensable injury.

  • Decision # 12/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to both payments covering wage loss benefits for the period February 11, 2011 to February 24, 2011; Whether or not the WCB should accept responsibility for the NSF fee; and Whether or not the worker's average earnings have been correctly determined.

  • Decision # 11/12

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 10/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to reimbursement for travelling expenses to attend a chiropractor in Winnipeg.

  • Decision # 09/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond December 11, 2008.

  • Decision # 08/12

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 07/12

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's wage loss benefits should be reinstated effective August 2, 2011.

  • Decision # 06/12

    Issue: Employer Appeal: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond February 3, 2011. Worker Appeal:Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits from February 19, 2011 to May 12, 2011.