Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 08/02

    Issue: Whether or not the victim is entitled to an increase in his Permanent Partial (Disability) Impairment Award.

  • Decision # 07/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period November 22 to December 1, 2000, inclusive.

  • Decision # 07/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 06/02

    Issue: Whether or not the application is acceptable.

  • Decision # 05/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond October 30, 1999.

  • Decision # 05/02

    Issue: Whether or not the time frame for filing the appeal should be extended pursuant to the provision of subsection 60(2) of the Victims' Bill of Rights; and Whether or not the application is acceptable.

  • Decision # 04/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period September 26, 2000 to November 22, 2000, inclusive; and Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 16, 2001.

  • Decision # 04/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 03/02

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's time loss from work commencing July 29, 1998.

  • Decision # 03/02

    Issue: Whether or not the application is acceptable.

  • Decision # 02/02

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to travel expenses to attend her chiropractor.

  • Decision # 02/02

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for expenses relating to relocation and name change.

  • Decision # 01/02

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 01/02

    Issue: Whether or not the life insurance proceeds are a benefit received pursuant to the provision of The Victims’ Rights Act; andWhether or not the dependant’s benefits should have been discontinued June 1, 2001.

  • Decision # 164/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 163/01

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened pursuant to section 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 162/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker has recovered from the effects of the compensable injury effective July 7, 2001.

  • Decision # 161/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's right of action is removed pursuant to Section 68(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 160/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 159/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond June 13, 2001.

  • Decision # 158/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker had recovered from the effects of the June 4, 2000 compensable injury by December 18, 2000.

  • Decision # 157/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 156/01

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 155/01

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's ongoing back problems are related to his compensable injuries of April 22 and May 13, 2000.