Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 67/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to vocational rehabilitation assistance and benefits.

  • Decision # 66/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the costs of a custom fitted knee brace.

  • Decision # 65/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 64/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits.

  • Decision # 63/03

    Issue: Whether or not a Medical Review Panel should be convened.

  • Decision # 62/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker's claim for low back complaints is acceptable in relation to the compensable accident of March 8, 2002.

  • Decision # 61/03

    Issue: Whether or not the diagnosis of fibromyalgia is related to the 1994 compensable jaw injury.

  • Decision # 60/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond January 10, 2001.

  • Decision # 59/03

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the claimant's left wrist complaints for which surgery has been performed.

  • Decision # 58/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond May 7, 2001.

  • Decision # 57/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to chiropractic treatment beyond December 29, 1999; and Whether or not the worker's neck and back complaints as of July 10, 2000 are related to the compensable injury of August 2, 1999.

  • Decision # 56/03

    Issue: Whether or not wage loss benefits are payable beyond August 31, 2001.

  • Decision # 55/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to temporary total disability benefits effective June 16, 2002.

  • Decision # 54/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim for bilateral achilles tendonitis is acceptable.

  • Decision # 53/03

    Issue: Whether or not the average earnings used in the calculation of the worker's additional disability award are appropriate.

  • Decision # 52/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond August 21, 1996.

  • Decision # 51/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond March 15, 2002; and Whether or not an overpayment in the amount of $2,078.51 currently exists on the claim.

  • Decision # 50/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 49/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to payment of wage loss benefits beyond June 6, 2000.

  • Decision # 48/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 31, 2001.

  • Decision # 47/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant's loss of earning capacity after November 24, 2001 is related to the compensable injury.

  • Decision # 46/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond September 7, 2001.

  • Decision # 45/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 44/03

    Issue: Whether or not the claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits beyond July 12, 2002.

  • Decision # 43/03

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to a Permanent Partial Disability award for noise induced hearing loss.